Commit Graph

9 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Byungchul Park 09b3efec81 bcache: Don't reinvent the wheel but use existing llist API
Although llist provides proper APIs, they are not used. Make them used.

Signed-off-by: Byungchul Park <byungchul.park@lge.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2017-09-06 08:17:33 -06:00
Yijing Wang 7abc70d700 bcache: update document info
There is no return in continue_at(), update the documentation.

Signed-off-by: Yijing Wang <wangyijing@huawei.com>
Acked-by: Coly Li <colyli@suse.de>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@fb.com>
2016-07-05 11:34:49 -06:00
Petr Mladek 8d090f4731 bcache: Really show state of work pending bit
WORK_STRUCT_PENDING is a mask for testing the pending bit.
test_bit() expects the number of the bit and we need to
use WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT there.

Also work_data_bits() is defined in workqueues.h now.

I have noticed this just by chance when looking how
WORK_STRUCT_PENDING_BIT is used. The change is compile
tested.

Signed-off-by: Petr Mladek <pmladek@suse.com>
Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
2015-11-06 15:06:05 +01:00
Kent Overstreet 1dd13c8d3c bcache: kill closure locking code
Also flesh out the documentation a bit

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
2014-01-08 13:05:08 -08:00
Kent Overstreet faadf0c965 bcache: Drop some closure stuff
With a the recent bcache refactoring, some of the closure code isn't
needed anymore.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
2013-11-10 21:56:10 -08:00
Kent Overstreet 6aa8f1a6ca bcache: Fix a dumb race
In the far-too-complicated closure code - closures can have destructors,
for probably dubious reasons; they get run after the closure is no
longer waiting on anything but before dropping the parent ref, intended
just for freeing whatever memory the closure is embedded in.

Trouble is, when remaining goes to 0 and we've got nothing more to run -
we also have to unlock the closure, setting remaining to -1. If there's
a destructor, that unlock isn't doing anything - nobody could be trying
to lock it if we're about to free it - but if the unlock _is needed...
that check for a destructor was racy. Argh.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <kmo@daterainc.com>
Cc: linux-stable <stable@vger.kernel.org> # >= v3.10
2013-07-12 00:22:33 -07:00
Kent Overstreet 29177b8966 bcache: Fix for the build fixes
Commit 82a84eaf7e51ba3da0c36cbc401034a4e943492d left a return 0 in
closure_debug_init(). Whoops.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2013-03-25 19:36:39 -06:00
Kent Overstreet 07e86ccb54 bcache: Build fixes from test robot
config: make ARCH=i386 allmodconfig

All error/warnings:

   drivers/md/bcache/bset.c: In function 'bch_ptr_bad':
>> drivers/md/bcache/bset.c:164:2: warning: format '%li' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' [-Wformat]
--
   drivers/md/bcache/debug.c: In function 'bch_pbtree':
>> drivers/md/bcache/debug.c:86:4: warning: format '%li' expects argument of type 'long int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' [-Wformat]
--
   drivers/md/bcache/btree.c: In function 'bch_btree_read_done':
>> drivers/md/bcache/btree.c:245:8: warning: format '%lu' expects argument of type 'long unsigned int', but argument 4 has type 'size_t' [-Wformat]
--
   drivers/md/bcache/closure.o: In function `closure_debug_init':
>> (.init.text+0x0): multiple definition of `init_module'
>> drivers/md/bcache/super.o:super.c:(.init.text+0x0): first defined here

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
Cc: Fengguang Wu <fengguang.wu@intel.com>
Cc: linux-bcache@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
2013-03-25 13:06:13 -06:00
Kent Overstreet cafe563591 bcache: A block layer cache
Does writethrough and writeback caching, handles unclean shutdown, and
has a bunch of other nifty features motivated by real world usage.

See the wiki at http://bcache.evilpiepirate.org for more.

Signed-off-by: Kent Overstreet <koverstreet@google.com>
2013-03-23 16:11:31 -07:00