psr.active is being unset out of the if so this here is useless and
duplicated.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Mainly taking care of some register offsets, otherwise things are similar to
hsw. Also, programming ddi aux to use hardcoded values for psr data select.
v2: introduce EDP_PSR_AUX_BASE macro (Chris)
v3: Moving to HW tracking for SKL+ platforms, so activating source psr during
psr_enabling and then avoiding psr entries and exits for each frontbuffer
updates.
v4: Using SKL DDI AUX regs instead of changing PSR_AUX regs definition (Rodrigo)
Signed-off-by: Sonika Jindal <sonika.jindal@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
[danvet: Drop the hunks to short-circuit sw tracking: We'd need to
push this down one level, and I don't fully trust the test coverage
yet to do so. So much prefer we pick a whitelist approach for the
cases we know work correctly.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
To match the semantics of drm_crtc->state, which this will eventually
become. The allocation of the memory for config will be fixed in a
followup patch. By adding the extra _config field to intel_crtc it was
possible to generate this entire patch with the cocci script below.
@@ @@
struct intel_crtc {
...
-struct intel_crtc_state config;
+struct intel_crtc_state _config;
+struct intel_crtc_state *config;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; @@
-memset(&crtc->config, 0, sizeof(crtc->config));
+memset(crtc->config, 0, sizeof(*crtc->config));
@@ @@
__intel_set_mode(...) {
<...
-to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config = *pipe_config;
+(*(to_intel_crtc(crtc)->config)) = *pipe_config;
...>
}
@@ @@
intel_crtc_init(...) {
...
WARN_ON(drm_crtc_index(&intel_crtc->base) != intel_crtc->pipe);
+intel_crtc->config = &intel_crtc->_config;
return;
...
}
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; @@
-&crtc->config
+crtc->config
@@ struct intel_crtc *crtc; identifier member; @@
-crtc->config.member
+crtc->config->member
@@ expression E; @@
-&(to_intel_crtc(E)->config)
+to_intel_crtc(E)->config
@@ expression E; identifier member; @@
-to_intel_crtc(E)->config.member
+to_intel_crtc(E)->config->member
v2: Clarify manual changes by splitting them into another patch. (Matt)
Improve cocci script to generate even more of the changes. (Ander)
Signed-off-by: Ander Conselvan de Oliveira <ander.conselvan.de.oliveira@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Matt Roper <matthew.d.roper@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
No functional changes on this patch. Just grouping the link_standy decision
to avoid miss any change. Also making this info available everywhere
which will help to decide when to use vbt's tp time on following patch.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
[danvet: Slight editing of the commit message which was one huge
run-on sentence.]
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Let's respect vbt full_link (link_standby) on source side as well.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
We have only two possible states with so many names and combinations that
might be confusing.
1 - Main link active / enabled / stand by / on
2 - Main link disabled / off / full off
Let's start organizing it by fixing a inverted logic when setting the sink bit.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
These conditions applies only to Haswell and we were also checking for them
on Valleyview/Cherryview.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
ON these platforms we don't have hardware tracking working for any case.
So we need to fake this on software by forcing psr to exit on every
flush.
Manual tests indicated this was needed.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This patch introduces exit/activate functions for PSR
on VLV+. Since on VLV+ HW cannot track frame updates and force PSR
exit let's use fully SW tracking available.
v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c;
Remove Single Frame update transitioning from state 3 to 5 directly;
Fake a software invalidation for sprites and cursor so we don't miss
any screen update;
v3: As pointed out by Durgadoss msecs_to_jiffies used on wait_for only uses int,
so let's use 1 instead. Althought the 1/4 of this is needed for the
transition let's use 1 for simplicity;
Also fix comments as suggested by Durgadoss
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
The biggest difference from HSW/BDW PSR here is that VLV enable_source
function enables PSR but let it in Inactive state. So it might be called
on early stage along with setup and enable_sink ones.
v2: Rebase over intel_psr.c;
Remove docs from static functions;
Merge vlv_psr_active_on_pipe;
Timeout for psr transition is 250us;
Remove SRC_TRASMITTER_STATE;
v3: Rebase after is_psr_enabled function got removed;
Get SRC_TRANSMITTER_STATE back to be on the safe side since
default for panels is to require link training on exit when
main link off;
As pointed out by Durgadoss msecs_to_jiffies used on wait_for only uses int,
so let's use 1 instead. Althought the 1/4 of this is needed for the
transition let's use 1 for simplicity;
Cc: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
This function was in use to check if PSR feature got enabled.
However on HSW and BDW we currently force psr exit by disabling
EDP_PSR_ENABLE bit at EDP_PSR_CTL(dev). So this function was actually
returning the active/inactive state that is different from the enable/disable
meaning and had the risk of false negative.
But anyway this check with DRRS was dangerous, since DRRS could try to get enabled
before PSR gets there. So let's just remove it for now.
A proper synchronization mechanism must be implemented later probably
using pipe config.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel@ffwll.ch>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Single frame update is a feature available on BDW for PSR that allows
Source to send Sink only one frame and get it updated. Usually useful
when page flipping. However with our frontbuffer tracking where we force
psr exit on flips we don't need this feature.
Also after it got added here many workaround was added to documentation
to mask some bits when using single frame update. So the safest thing
is to just stop using it.
v2: Rebase after removing skip aux one and fixing typo on commit message.
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
OEMs can specify if full_link might be always enabled, i.e. only_standby
over VBT.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Let's use VBT + 1 now we parse it.
v2: fix subject
v3: rebase over intel_psr and without counting on previous fix
Cc: Arthur Runyan <arthur.j.runyan@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Reviewed-by: Durgadoss R <durgadoss.r@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Let's document PSR a bit. No functional changes.
v2: Add actual DocBook entry and accept Daniel's improvements.
Cc: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
No functional changes. Just cleaning and reorganizing it.
v2: Rebase it puting it to begin of psr rework. This helps to blame easily
at least latest changes.
Signed-off-by: Rodrigo Vivi <rodrigo.vivi@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Daniel Vetter <daniel.vetter@ffwll.ch>
Rodrigo Vivi