f2fs: don't track newly allocated nat entry in list
We will never persist newly allocated nat entries during checkpoint(), so we don't need to track such nat entries in nat dirty list in order to avoid: - more latency during traversing dirty list; - sorting nat sets incorrectly due to recording wrong entry_cnt in nat entry set. Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@huawei.com> Signed-off-by: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d9703d9097
commit
febeca6d37
|
@ -158,9 +158,6 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
|
|||
nid_t set = NAT_BLOCK_OFFSET(ne->ni.nid);
|
||||
struct nat_entry_set *head;
|
||||
|
||||
if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
head = radix_tree_lookup(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set);
|
||||
if (!head) {
|
||||
head = f2fs_kmem_cache_alloc(nat_entry_set_slab, GFP_NOFS);
|
||||
|
@ -171,10 +168,18 @@ static void __set_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
|
|||
head->entry_cnt = 0;
|
||||
f2fs_radix_tree_insert(&nm_i->nat_set_root, set, head);
|
||||
}
|
||||
list_move_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list);
|
||||
|
||||
if (get_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY))
|
||||
goto refresh_list;
|
||||
|
||||
nm_i->dirty_nat_cnt++;
|
||||
head->entry_cnt++;
|
||||
set_nat_flag(ne, IS_DIRTY, true);
|
||||
refresh_list:
|
||||
if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR)
|
||||
list_del_init(&ne->list);
|
||||
else
|
||||
list_move_tail(&ne->list, &head->entry_list);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void __clear_nat_cache_dirty(struct f2fs_nm_info *nm_i,
|
||||
|
@ -2423,8 +2428,7 @@ static void __flush_nat_entry_set(struct f2fs_sb_info *sbi,
|
|||
nid_t nid = nat_get_nid(ne);
|
||||
int offset;
|
||||
|
||||
if (nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
f2fs_bug_on(sbi, nat_get_blkaddr(ne) == NEW_ADDR);
|
||||
|
||||
if (to_journal) {
|
||||
offset = lookup_journal_in_cursum(journal,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue