Merge branch 'locking/urgent' into locking/core
Reason: Required to add more rtmutex robustness changes on top of those already in mainline. Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
This commit is contained in:
commit
fddeca638e
|
@ -31,3 +31,8 @@ static inline int debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter,
|
|||
{
|
||||
return (waiter != NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -83,6 +83,47 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
|||
owner = *p;
|
||||
} while (cmpxchg(p, owner, owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS) != owner);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Safe fastpath aware unlock:
|
||||
* 1) Clear the waiters bit
|
||||
* 2) Drop lock->wait_lock
|
||||
* 3) Try to unlock the lock with cmpxchg
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||
__releases(lock->wait_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
||||
|
||||
clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If a new waiter comes in between the unlock and the cmpxchg
|
||||
* we have two situations:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* unlock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* lock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) == owner
|
||||
* mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
||||
* acquire(lock);
|
||||
* or:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* unlock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* lock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* mark_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
||||
*
|
||||
* cmpxchg(p, owner, 0) != owner
|
||||
* enqueue_waiter();
|
||||
* unlock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* lock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* wake waiter();
|
||||
* unlock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* lock(wait_lock);
|
||||
* acquire(lock);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
return rt_mutex_cmpxchg(lock, owner, NULL);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#else
|
||||
# define rt_mutex_cmpxchg(l,c,n) (0)
|
||||
static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||
|
@ -90,6 +131,17 @@ static inline void mark_rt_mutex_waiters(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
|||
lock->owner = (struct task_struct *)
|
||||
((unsigned long)lock->owner | RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Simple slow path only version: lock->owner is protected by lock->wait_lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static inline bool unlock_rt_mutex_safe(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
||||
__releases(lock->wait_lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
lock->owner = NULL;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
return true;
|
||||
}
|
||||
#endif
|
||||
|
||||
static inline int
|
||||
|
@ -260,27 +312,36 @@ static void rt_mutex_adjust_prio(struct task_struct *task)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
int max_lock_depth = 1024;
|
||||
|
||||
static inline struct rt_mutex *task_blocked_on_lock(struct task_struct *p)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return p->pi_blocked_on ? p->pi_blocked_on->lock : NULL;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Adjust the priority chain. Also used for deadlock detection.
|
||||
* Decreases task's usage by one - may thus free the task.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* @task: the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is probably
|
||||
* needed
|
||||
* @task: the task owning the mutex (owner) for which a chain walk is
|
||||
* probably needed
|
||||
* @deadlock_detect: do we have to carry out deadlock detection?
|
||||
* @orig_lock: the mutex (can be NULL if we are walking the chain to recheck
|
||||
* things for a task that has just got its priority adjusted, and
|
||||
* is waiting on a mutex)
|
||||
* @orig_lock: the mutex (can be NULL if we are walking the chain to recheck
|
||||
* things for a task that has just got its priority adjusted, and
|
||||
* is waiting on a mutex)
|
||||
* @next_lock: the mutex on which the owner of @orig_lock was blocked before
|
||||
* we dropped its pi_lock. Is never dereferenced, only used for
|
||||
* comparison to detect lock chain changes.
|
||||
* @orig_waiter: rt_mutex_waiter struct for the task that has just donated
|
||||
* its priority to the mutex owner (can be NULL in the case
|
||||
* depicted above or if the top waiter is gone away and we are
|
||||
* actually deboosting the owner)
|
||||
* @top_task: the current top waiter
|
||||
* its priority to the mutex owner (can be NULL in the case
|
||||
* depicted above or if the top waiter is gone away and we are
|
||||
* actually deboosting the owner)
|
||||
* @top_task: the current top waiter
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Returns 0 or -EDEADLK.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
||||
int deadlock_detect,
|
||||
struct rt_mutex *orig_lock,
|
||||
struct rt_mutex *next_lock,
|
||||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *orig_waiter,
|
||||
struct task_struct *top_task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
|
@ -314,7 +375,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
}
|
||||
put_task_struct(task);
|
||||
|
||||
return deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0;
|
||||
return -EDEADLK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
retry:
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -338,6 +399,18 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
if (orig_waiter && !rt_mutex_owner(orig_lock))
|
||||
goto out_unlock_pi;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We dropped all locks after taking a refcount on @task, so
|
||||
* the task might have moved on in the lock chain or even left
|
||||
* the chain completely and blocks now on an unrelated lock or
|
||||
* on @orig_lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* We stored the lock on which @task was blocked in @next_lock,
|
||||
* so we can detect the chain change.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (next_lock != waiter->lock)
|
||||
goto out_unlock_pi;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Drop out, when the task has no waiters. Note,
|
||||
* top_waiter can be NULL, when we are in the deboosting
|
||||
|
@ -377,7 +450,7 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
if (lock == orig_lock || rt_mutex_owner(lock) == top_task) {
|
||||
debug_rt_mutex_deadlock(deadlock_detect, orig_waiter, lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
ret = deadlock_detect ? -EDEADLK : 0;
|
||||
ret = -EDEADLK;
|
||||
goto out_unlock_pi;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -422,11 +495,26 @@ static int rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(struct task_struct *task,
|
|||
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(task);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Check whether the task which owns the current lock is pi
|
||||
* blocked itself. If yes we store a pointer to the lock for
|
||||
* the lock chain change detection above. After we dropped
|
||||
* task->pi_lock next_lock cannot be dereferenced anymore.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(task);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
top_waiter = rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock);
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We reached the end of the lock chain. Stop right here. No
|
||||
* point to go back just to figure that out.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!next_lock)
|
||||
goto out_put_task;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!detect_deadlock && waiter != top_waiter)
|
||||
goto out_put_task;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -536,8 +624,9 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
||||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *top_waiter = waiter;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
|
||||
int chain_walk = 0, res;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Early deadlock detection. We really don't want the task to
|
||||
|
@ -548,7 +637,7 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
* which is wrong, as the other waiter is not in a deadlock
|
||||
* situation.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (detect_deadlock && owner == task)
|
||||
if (owner == task)
|
||||
return -EDEADLK;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
@ -569,20 +658,28 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
if (!owner)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
if (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock)) {
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(owner, top_waiter);
|
||||
rt_mutex_enqueue_pi(owner, waiter);
|
||||
|
||||
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
|
||||
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
|
||||
chain_walk = 1;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock))
|
||||
} else if (debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(waiter, detect_deadlock)) {
|
||||
chain_walk = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!chain_walk)
|
||||
/* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */
|
||||
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Even if full deadlock detection is on, if the owner is not
|
||||
* blocked itself, we can avoid finding this out in the chain
|
||||
* walk.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (!chain_walk || !next_lock)
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
@ -594,8 +691,8 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock, waiter,
|
||||
task);
|
||||
res = rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, detect_deadlock, lock,
|
||||
next_lock, waiter, task);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -605,7 +702,8 @@ static int task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
/*
|
||||
* Wake up the next waiter on the lock.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Remove the top waiter from the current tasks waiter list and wake it up.
|
||||
* Remove the top waiter from the current tasks pi waiter list and
|
||||
* wake it up.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Called with lock->wait_lock held.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -626,10 +724,23 @@ static void wakeup_next_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
|||
*/
|
||||
rt_mutex_dequeue_pi(current, waiter);
|
||||
|
||||
rt_mutex_set_owner(lock, NULL);
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* As we are waking up the top waiter, and the waiter stays
|
||||
* queued on the lock until it gets the lock, this lock
|
||||
* obviously has waiters. Just set the bit here and this has
|
||||
* the added benefit of forcing all new tasks into the
|
||||
* slow path making sure no task of lower priority than
|
||||
* the top waiter can steal this lock.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
lock->owner = (void *) RT_MUTEX_HAS_WAITERS;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* It's safe to dereference waiter as it cannot go away as
|
||||
* long as we hold lock->wait_lock. The waiter task needs to
|
||||
* acquire it in order to dequeue the waiter.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
wake_up_process(waiter->task);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -644,8 +755,8 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
{
|
||||
int first = (waiter == rt_mutex_top_waiter(lock));
|
||||
struct task_struct *owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
||||
struct rt_mutex *next_lock = NULL;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
int chain_walk = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(¤t->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
rt_mutex_dequeue(lock, waiter);
|
||||
|
@ -669,13 +780,13 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
}
|
||||
__rt_mutex_adjust_prio(owner);
|
||||
|
||||
if (owner->pi_blocked_on)
|
||||
chain_walk = 1;
|
||||
/* Store the lock on which owner is blocked or NULL */
|
||||
next_lock = task_blocked_on_lock(owner);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&owner->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (!chain_walk)
|
||||
if (!next_lock)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
|
||||
|
@ -683,7 +794,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, NULL, current);
|
||||
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(owner, 0, lock, next_lock, NULL, current);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -696,6 +807,7 @@ static void remove_waiter(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
|
||||
{
|
||||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *waiter;
|
||||
struct rt_mutex *next_lock;
|
||||
unsigned long flags;
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_lock_irqsave(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
@ -706,12 +818,13 @@ void rt_mutex_adjust_pi(struct task_struct *task)
|
|||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
next_lock = waiter->lock;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock_irqrestore(&task->pi_lock, flags);
|
||||
|
||||
/* gets dropped in rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain()! */
|
||||
get_task_struct(task);
|
||||
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, NULL, task);
|
||||
|
||||
rt_mutex_adjust_prio_chain(task, 0, NULL, next_lock, NULL, task);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
@ -763,6 +876,26 @@ __rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static void rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(int res, int detect_deadlock,
|
||||
struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If the result is not -EDEADLOCK or the caller requested
|
||||
* deadlock detection, nothing to do here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (res != -EDEADLOCK || detect_deadlock)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Yell lowdly and stop the task right here.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w);
|
||||
while (1) {
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_INTERRUPTIBLE);
|
||||
schedule();
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Slow path lock function:
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -802,8 +935,10 @@ rt_mutex_slowlock(struct rt_mutex *lock, int state,
|
|||
|
||||
set_current_state(TASK_RUNNING);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret))
|
||||
if (unlikely(ret)) {
|
||||
remove_waiter(lock, &waiter);
|
||||
rt_mutex_handle_deadlock(ret, detect_deadlock, &waiter);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* try_to_take_rt_mutex() sets the waiter bit
|
||||
|
@ -859,12 +994,49 @@ rt_mutex_slowunlock(struct rt_mutex *lock)
|
|||
|
||||
rt_mutex_deadlock_account_unlock(current);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
||||
lock->owner = NULL;
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We must be careful here if the fast path is enabled. If we
|
||||
* have no waiters queued we cannot set owner to NULL here
|
||||
* because of:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* foo->lock->owner = NULL;
|
||||
* rtmutex_lock(foo->lock); <- fast path
|
||||
* free = atomic_dec_and_test(foo->refcnt);
|
||||
* rtmutex_unlock(foo->lock); <- fast path
|
||||
* if (free)
|
||||
* kfree(foo);
|
||||
* raw_spin_unlock(foo->lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
*
|
||||
* So for the fastpath enabled kernel:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Nothing can set the waiters bit as long as we hold
|
||||
* lock->wait_lock. So we do the following sequence:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* owner = rt_mutex_owner(lock);
|
||||
* clear_rt_mutex_waiters(lock);
|
||||
* raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
* if (cmpxchg(&lock->owner, owner, 0) == owner)
|
||||
* return;
|
||||
* goto retry;
|
||||
*
|
||||
* The fastpath disabled variant is simple as all access to
|
||||
* lock->owner is serialized by lock->wait_lock:
|
||||
*
|
||||
* lock->owner = NULL;
|
||||
* raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
*/
|
||||
while (!rt_mutex_has_waiters(lock)) {
|
||||
/* Drops lock->wait_lock ! */
|
||||
if (unlock_rt_mutex_safe(lock) == true)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
/* Relock the rtmutex and try again */
|
||||
raw_spin_lock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The wakeup next waiter path does not suffer from the above
|
||||
* race. See the comments there.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
wakeup_next_waiter(lock);
|
||||
|
||||
raw_spin_unlock(&lock->wait_lock);
|
||||
|
@ -1112,7 +1284,8 @@ int rt_mutex_start_proxy_lock(struct rt_mutex *lock,
|
|||
return 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, detect_deadlock);
|
||||
/* We enforce deadlock detection for futexes */
|
||||
ret = task_blocks_on_rt_mutex(lock, waiter, task, 1);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret && !rt_mutex_owner(lock)) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -24,3 +24,8 @@
|
|||
#define debug_rt_mutex_print_deadlock(w) do { } while (0)
|
||||
#define debug_rt_mutex_detect_deadlock(w,d) (d)
|
||||
#define debug_rt_mutex_reset_waiter(w) do { } while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
static inline void rt_mutex_print_deadlock(struct rt_mutex_waiter *w)
|
||||
{
|
||||
WARN(1, "rtmutex deadlock detected\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue