rtc: fix alarm read and set offset
The offset needs to be added after reading the alarm value. It also needs to be subtracted after the now < alarm test. Tested-by: Jon Hunter <jonathanh@nvidia.com> Signed-off-by: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@bootlin.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
ca95ef7c98
commit
fd6792bb02
|
@ -265,8 +265,10 @@ int __rtc_read_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
|
|||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
/* full-function RTCs won't have such missing fields */
|
||||
if (rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time) == 0)
|
||||
if (rtc_valid_tm(&alarm->time) == 0) {
|
||||
rtc_add_offset(rtc, &alarm->time);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* get the "after" timestamp, to detect wrapped fields */
|
||||
err = rtc_read_time(rtc, &now);
|
||||
|
@ -409,7 +411,6 @@ static int __rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
|
|||
if (err)
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
|
||||
rtc_subtract_offset(rtc, &alarm->time);
|
||||
scheduled = rtc_tm_to_time64(&alarm->time);
|
||||
|
||||
/* Make sure we're not setting alarms in the past */
|
||||
|
@ -426,6 +427,8 @@ static int __rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
|
|||
* over right here, before we set the alarm.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
||||
rtc_subtract_offset(rtc, &alarm->time);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!rtc->ops)
|
||||
err = -ENODEV;
|
||||
else if (!rtc->ops->set_alarm)
|
||||
|
@ -467,7 +470,6 @@ int rtc_set_alarm(struct rtc_device *rtc, struct rtc_wkalrm *alarm)
|
|||
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&rtc->ops_lock);
|
||||
|
||||
rtc_add_offset(rtc, &alarm->time);
|
||||
return err;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(rtc_set_alarm);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue