hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

[JFFS2] When retiring nextblock, allocate a node_ref for the wasted space 

Failing to do so makes the calculated length of the last node incorrect,
when we're not using eraseblock summaries.

Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <dwmw2@infradead.org>
This commit is contained in:
David Woodhouse 2006-06-18 18:35:10 +01:00
parent 2ba72cb754
commit fc6612f627
1 changed files with 22 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

26
fs/jffs2/nodemgmt.c
View File

@ -317,6 +317,8 @@ static int jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, uint32_t minsize,
}
} else {
if (jeb && minsize > jeb->free_size) {
uint32_t waste;
/* Skip the end of this block and file it as having some dirty space */
/* If there's a pending write to it, flush now */
@ -329,10 +331,26 @@ static int jffs2_do_reserve_space(struct jffs2_sb_info *c, uint32_t minsize,
goto restart;
}
c->wasted_size += jeb->free_size;
c->free_size -= jeb->free_size;
jeb->wasted_size += jeb->free_size;
jeb->free_size = 0;
spin_unlock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
ret = jffs2_prealloc_raw_node_refs(c, jeb, 1);
if (ret)
return ret;
/* Just lock it again and continue. Nothing much can change because
we hold c->alloc_sem anyway. In fact, it's not entirely clear why
we hold c->erase_completion_lock in the majority of this function...
but that's a question for another (more caffeine-rich) day. */
spin_lock(&c->erase_completion_lock);
waste = jeb->free_size;
jffs2_link_node_ref(c, jeb,
(jeb->offset + c->sector_size - waste) | REF_OBSOLETE,
waste, NULL);
/* FIXME: that made it count as dirty. Convert to wasted */
jeb->dirty_size -= waste;
c->dirty_size -= waste;
jeb->wasted_size += waste;
c->wasted_size += waste;
jffs2_close_nextblock(c, jeb);
jeb = NULL;