hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

mtd: m25p80: Fix false-positive probing 

Since commit 18c6182bae ("Rework
probing/JEDEC code"), m25p80 driver successfully registers chips
even if JEDEC probing fails.

This was needed to support non-JEDEC flashes. Though, it appears
that some platforms (e.g. blackfin bf533 stamp[1]) used the old
behavior to detect if there's any flash connected, so the driver
have to fail on JEDEC probing errors.

This patch restores the old behavior for JEDEC flashes, and adds
"-nonjedec" SPI device IDs for M25Pxx flashes, so that the kernel
still supports non-JEDEC flashes.

[1] http://blackfin.uclinux.org/gf/project/uclinux-dist/tracker/?action=TrackerItemEdit&tracker_item_id=5975

Reported-by: Mingquan Pan
Reported-by: Barry Song <21cnbao@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Anton Vorontsov <avorontsov@mvista.com>
Acked-by: Mike Frysinger <vapier@gentoo.org>
Signed-off-by: Artem Bityutskiy <Artem.Bityutskiy@nokia.com>
Signed-off-by: David Woodhouse <David.Woodhouse@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Anton Vorontsov 2010-06-22 20:57:34 +04:00 committed by David Woodhouse
parent dd02b67d5e
commit f7b000904a
1 changed files with 11 additions and 2 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

13
drivers/mtd/devices/m25p80.c
View File

@ -681,6 +681,16 @@ static const struct spi_device_id m25p_ids[] = {
{ "m25p64", INFO(0x202017, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
{ "m25p128", INFO(0x202018, 0, 256 * 1024, 64, 0) },
{ "m25p05-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 32 * 1024, 2, 0) },
{ "m25p10-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 32 * 1024, 4, 0) },
{ "m25p20-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 64 * 1024, 4, 0) },
{ "m25p40-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 64 * 1024, 8, 0) },
{ "m25p80-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 64 * 1024, 16, 0) },
{ "m25p16-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0) },
{ "m25p32-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 64 * 1024, 64, 0) },
{ "m25p64-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 64 * 1024, 128, 0) },
{ "m25p128-nonjedec", INFO(0, 0, 256 * 1024, 64, 0) },
{ "m45pe10", INFO(0x204011, 0, 64 * 1024, 2, 0) },
{ "m45pe80", INFO(0x204014, 0, 64 * 1024, 16, 0) },
{ "m45pe16", INFO(0x204015, 0, 64 * 1024, 32, 0) },
@ -796,8 +806,7 @@ static int __devinit m25p_probe(struct spi_device *spi)
jid = jedec_probe(spi);
if (!jid) {
dev_info(&spi->dev, "non-JEDEC variant of %s\n",
id->name);
return -ENODEV;
} else if (jid != id) {
/*
* JEDEC knows better, so overwrite platform ID. We