io_uring: check if we need to reschedule during overflow flush
[ Upstream commit eac2ca2d68
]
In terms of normal application usage, this list will always be empty.
And if an application does overflow a bit, it'll have a few entries.
However, nothing obviously prevents syzbot from running a test case
that generates a ton of overflow entries, and then flushing them can
take quite a while.
Check for needing to reschedule while flushing, and drop our locks and
do so if necessary. There's no state to maintain here as overflows
always prune from head-of-list, hence it's fine to drop and reacquire
the locks at the end of the loop.
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/io-uring/66ed061d.050a0220.29194.0053.GAE@google.com/
Reported-by: syzbot+5fca234bd7eb378ff78e@syzkaller.appspotmail.com
Signed-off-by: Jens Axboe <axboe@kernel.dk>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3088483336
commit
f4ce3b5d26
|
@ -701,6 +701,21 @@ static void __io_cqring_overflow_flush(struct io_ring_ctx *ctx)
|
|||
memcpy(cqe, &ocqe->cqe, cqe_size);
|
||||
list_del(&ocqe->list);
|
||||
kfree(ocqe);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* For silly syzbot cases that deliberately overflow by huge
|
||||
* amounts, check if we need to resched and drop and
|
||||
* reacquire the locks if so. Nothing real would ever hit this.
|
||||
* Ideally we'd have a non-posting unlock for this, but hard
|
||||
* to care for a non-real case.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (need_resched()) {
|
||||
io_cq_unlock_post(ctx);
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&ctx->uring_lock);
|
||||
cond_resched();
|
||||
mutex_lock(&ctx->uring_lock);
|
||||
io_cq_lock(ctx);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if (list_empty(&ctx->cq_overflow_list)) {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue