i40e/i40evf: Fix handling of boolean logic in polling routines
In the polling routines for i40e and i40evf we were using bitwise operators
to avoid the side effects of the logical operators, specifically the fact
that if the first case is true with "||" we skip the second case, or if it
is false with "&&" we skip the second case. This fixes an earlier patch
that converted the bitwise operators over to the logical operators and
instead replaces the entire thing with just an if statement since it should
be more readable what we are trying to do this way.
Fixes: 1a36d7fadd
("i40e/i40evf: use logical operators, not bitwise")
Signed-off-by: Alexander Duyck <aduyck@mirantis.com>
Tested-by: Andrew Bowers <andrewx.bowers@intel.com>
Signed-off-by: Jeff Kirsher <jeffrey.t.kirsher@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
311f23e9a4
commit
f2edaaaa39
|
@ -1975,9 +1975,11 @@ int i40e_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
|||
* budget and be more aggressive about cleaning up the Tx descriptors.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
i40e_for_each_ring(ring, q_vector->tx) {
|
||||
clean_complete = clean_complete &&
|
||||
i40e_clean_tx_irq(ring, vsi->work_limit);
|
||||
arm_wb = arm_wb || ring->arm_wb;
|
||||
if (!i40e_clean_tx_irq(ring, vsi->work_limit)) {
|
||||
clean_complete = false;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
arm_wb |= ring->arm_wb;
|
||||
ring->arm_wb = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1999,8 +2001,9 @@ int i40e_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
|||
cleaned = i40e_clean_rx_irq_1buf(ring, budget_per_ring);
|
||||
|
||||
work_done += cleaned;
|
||||
/* if we didn't clean as many as budgeted, we must be done */
|
||||
clean_complete = clean_complete && (budget_per_ring > cleaned);
|
||||
/* if we clean as many as budgeted, we must not be done */
|
||||
if (cleaned >= budget_per_ring)
|
||||
clean_complete = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If work not completed, return budget and polling will return */
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1411,9 +1411,11 @@ int i40evf_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
|||
* budget and be more aggressive about cleaning up the Tx descriptors.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
i40e_for_each_ring(ring, q_vector->tx) {
|
||||
clean_complete = clean_complete &&
|
||||
i40e_clean_tx_irq(ring, vsi->work_limit);
|
||||
arm_wb = arm_wb || ring->arm_wb;
|
||||
if (!i40e_clean_tx_irq(ring, vsi->work_limit)) {
|
||||
clean_complete = false;
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
}
|
||||
arm_wb |= ring->arm_wb;
|
||||
ring->arm_wb = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1435,8 +1437,9 @@ int i40evf_napi_poll(struct napi_struct *napi, int budget)
|
|||
cleaned = i40e_clean_rx_irq_1buf(ring, budget_per_ring);
|
||||
|
||||
work_done += cleaned;
|
||||
/* if we didn't clean as many as budgeted, we must be done */
|
||||
clean_complete = clean_complete && (budget_per_ring > cleaned);
|
||||
/* if we clean as many as budgeted, we must not be done */
|
||||
if (cleaned >= budget_per_ring)
|
||||
clean_complete = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/* If work not completed, return budget and polling will return */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue