btrfs: tree-checker: Make chunk item checker messages more readable
Old error message would be something like: BTRFS error (device dm-3): invalid chunk num_stipres: 0 New error message would be: Btrfs critical (device dm-3): corrupt superblock syschunk array: chunk_start=2097152, invalid chunk num_stripes: 0 Or Btrfs critical (device dm-3): corrupt leaf: root=3 block=8388608 slot=3 chunk_start=2097152, invalid chunk num_stripes: 0 And for certain error message, also output expected value. The error message levels are changed from error to critical. Reviewed-by: Johannes Thumshirn <jthumshirn@suse.de> Signed-off-by: Qu Wenruo <wqu@suse.com> Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
82fc28fbed
commit
f114024376
|
@ -448,6 +448,51 @@ static int check_block_group_item(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
__printf(5, 6)
|
||||
__cold
|
||||
static void chunk_err(const struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
||||
const struct extent_buffer *leaf,
|
||||
const struct btrfs_chunk *chunk, u64 logical,
|
||||
const char *fmt, ...)
|
||||
{
|
||||
bool is_sb;
|
||||
struct va_format vaf;
|
||||
va_list args;
|
||||
int i;
|
||||
int slot = -1;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Only superblock eb is able to have such small offset */
|
||||
is_sb = (leaf->start == BTRFS_SUPER_INFO_OFFSET);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!is_sb) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* Get the slot number by iterating through all slots, this
|
||||
* would provide better readability.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
for (i = 0; i < btrfs_header_nritems(leaf); i++) {
|
||||
if (btrfs_item_ptr_offset(leaf, i) ==
|
||||
(unsigned long)chunk) {
|
||||
slot = i;
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
va_start(args, fmt);
|
||||
vaf.fmt = fmt;
|
||||
vaf.va = &args;
|
||||
|
||||
if (is_sb)
|
||||
btrfs_crit(fs_info,
|
||||
"corrupt superblock syschunk array: chunk_start=%llu, %pV",
|
||||
logical, &vaf);
|
||||
else
|
||||
btrfs_crit(fs_info,
|
||||
"corrupt leaf: root=%llu block=%llu slot=%d chunk_start=%llu, %pV",
|
||||
BTRFS_CHUNK_TREE_OBJECTID, leaf->start, slot,
|
||||
logical, &vaf);
|
||||
va_end(args);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* The common chunk check which could also work on super block sys chunk array.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
@ -473,31 +518,38 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
type = btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk);
|
||||
|
||||
if (!num_stripes) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid chunk num_stripes: %u",
|
||||
num_stripes);
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk num_stripes, have %u", num_stripes);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!IS_ALIGNED(logical, fs_info->sectorsize)) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid chunk logical %llu", logical);
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk logical, have %llu should aligned to %u",
|
||||
logical, fs_info->sectorsize);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk) != fs_info->sectorsize) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid chunk sectorsize %u",
|
||||
btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk));
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk sectorsize, have %u expect %u",
|
||||
btrfs_chunk_sector_size(leaf, chunk),
|
||||
fs_info->sectorsize);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!length || !IS_ALIGNED(length, fs_info->sectorsize)) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid chunk length %llu", length);
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk length, have %llu", length);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (!is_power_of_2(stripe_len) || stripe_len != BTRFS_STRIPE_LEN) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "invalid chunk stripe length: %llu",
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid chunk stripe length: %llu",
|
||||
stripe_len);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
|
||||
type) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "unrecognized chunk type: %llu",
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"unrecognized chunk type: 0x%llx",
|
||||
~(BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK |
|
||||
BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) &
|
||||
btrfs_chunk_type(leaf, chunk));
|
||||
|
@ -505,14 +557,17 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK) == 0) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info, "missing chunk type flag: 0x%llx", type);
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"missing chunk type flag, have 0x%llx one bit must be set in 0x%llx",
|
||||
type, BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_TYPE_MASK);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_SYSTEM) &&
|
||||
(type & (BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA | BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA))) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info,
|
||||
"system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx", type);
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"system chunk with data or metadata type: 0x%llx",
|
||||
type);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -523,7 +578,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
if (!mixed) {
|
||||
if ((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_METADATA) &&
|
||||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DATA)) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info,
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"mixed chunk type in non-mixed mode: 0x%llx", type);
|
||||
return -EIO;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -535,7 +590,7 @@ int btrfs_check_chunk_valid(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info,
|
|||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_RAID6 && num_stripes < 3) ||
|
||||
(type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_DUP && num_stripes != 2) ||
|
||||
((type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK) == 0 && num_stripes != 1)) {
|
||||
btrfs_err(fs_info,
|
||||
chunk_err(fs_info, leaf, chunk, logical,
|
||||
"invalid num_stripes:sub_stripes %u:%u for profile %llu",
|
||||
num_stripes, sub_stripes,
|
||||
type & BTRFS_BLOCK_GROUP_PROFILE_MASK);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue