uprobes: Kill the pointless inode/uc checks in register/unregister
register/unregister verifies that inode/uc != NULL. For what? This really looks like "hide the potential problem", the caller should pass the valid data. register() also checks uc->next == NULL, probably to prevent the double-register but the caller can do other stupid/wrong things. If we do this check, then we should document that uc->next should be cleared before register() and add BUG_ON(). Also add the small comment about the i_size_read() check. Signed-off-by: Oleg Nesterov <oleg@redhat.com> Acked-by: Srikar Dronamraju <srikar@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bbc33d0593
commit
f0744af7d0
|
@ -844,9 +844,7 @@ int uprobe_register(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consumer *
|
|||
struct uprobe *uprobe;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!inode || !uc || uc->next)
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
/* Racy, just to catch the obvious mistakes */
|
||||
if (offset > i_size_read(inode))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -883,9 +881,6 @@ void uprobe_unregister(struct inode *inode, loff_t offset, struct uprobe_consume
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct uprobe *uprobe;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!inode || !uc)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
uprobe = find_uprobe(inode, offset);
|
||||
if (!uprobe)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue