mm: mminit_validate_memmodel_limits(): remove redundant test
In case if start_pfn overlap the upper bound no need to test end_pfn again since we have it already trimmed. Signed-off-by: Cyrill Gorcunov <gorcunov@openvz.org> Reviewed-by: Christoph Lameter <cl@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0f043a81eb
commit
ef161a9863
|
@ -164,9 +164,7 @@ void __meminit mminit_validate_memmodel_limits(unsigned long *start_pfn,
|
||||||
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
|
WARN_ON_ONCE(1);
|
||||||
*start_pfn = max_sparsemem_pfn;
|
*start_pfn = max_sparsemem_pfn;
|
||||||
*end_pfn = max_sparsemem_pfn;
|
*end_pfn = max_sparsemem_pfn;
|
||||||
}
|
} else if (*end_pfn > max_sparsemem_pfn) {
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (*end_pfn > max_sparsemem_pfn) {
|
|
||||||
mminit_dprintk(MMINIT_WARNING, "pfnvalidation",
|
mminit_dprintk(MMINIT_WARNING, "pfnvalidation",
|
||||||
"End of range %lu -> %lu exceeds SPARSEMEM max %lu\n",
|
"End of range %lu -> %lu exceeds SPARSEMEM max %lu\n",
|
||||||
*start_pfn, *end_pfn, max_sparsemem_pfn);
|
*start_pfn, *end_pfn, max_sparsemem_pfn);
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue