fuse: abort: no fc->lock needed for request ending
In fuse_abort_conn() when all requests are on private lists we no longer need fc->lock protection. Signed-off-by: Miklos Szeredi <mszeredi@suse.cz> Reviewed-by: Ashish Samant <ashish.samant@oracle.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
46c34a348b
commit
ee314a870e
|
@ -2072,8 +2072,6 @@ static unsigned fuse_dev_poll(struct file *file, poll_table *wait)
|
|||
* This function releases and reacquires fc->lock
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static void end_requests(struct fuse_conn *fc, struct list_head *head)
|
||||
__releases(fc->lock)
|
||||
__acquires(fc->lock)
|
||||
{
|
||||
while (!list_empty(head)) {
|
||||
struct fuse_req *req;
|
||||
|
@ -2082,9 +2080,7 @@ __acquires(fc->lock)
|
|||
clear_bit(FR_PENDING, &req->flags);
|
||||
clear_bit(FR_SENT, &req->flags);
|
||||
list_del_init(&req->list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
request_end(fc, req);
|
||||
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2160,20 +2156,20 @@ void fuse_abort_conn(struct fuse_conn *fc)
|
|||
wake_up_all_locked(&fiq->waitq);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fiq->waitq.lock);
|
||||
kill_fasync(&fiq->fasync, SIGIO, POLL_IN);
|
||||
end_polls(fc);
|
||||
wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
|
||||
while (!list_empty(&to_end1)) {
|
||||
req = list_first_entry(&to_end1, struct fuse_req, list);
|
||||
__fuse_get_request(req);
|
||||
list_del_init(&req->list);
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
request_end(fc, req);
|
||||
spin_lock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
end_requests(fc, &to_end2);
|
||||
end_polls(fc);
|
||||
wake_up_all(&fc->blocked_waitq);
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
spin_unlock(&fc->lock);
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(fuse_abort_conn);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue