rcu: Update documentation of rcu_read_unlock()
Since commit b4abf91047
("rtmutex: Make wait_lock irq safe") the
explanation in rcu_read_unlock() documentation about irq unsafe rtmutex
wait_lock is no longer valid.
Remove it to prevent kernel developers reading the documentation to rely on
it.
Suggested-by: Eric W. Biederman <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Signed-off-by: Anna-Maria Gleixner <anna-maria@linutronix.de>
Signed-off-by: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@linutronix.de>
Reviewed-by: Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Acked-by: "Eric W. Biederman" <ebiederm@xmission.com>
Cc: bigeasy@linutronix.de
Link: https://lkml.kernel.org/r/20180525090507.22248-2-anna-maria@linutronix.de
This commit is contained in:
parent
cd77849a69
commit
ec84b27f9b
|
@ -652,9 +652,7 @@ static inline void rcu_read_lock(void)
|
|||
* Unfortunately, this function acquires the scheduler's runqueue and
|
||||
* priority-inheritance spinlocks. This means that deadlock could result
|
||||
* if the caller of rcu_read_unlock() already holds one of these locks or
|
||||
* any lock that is ever acquired while holding them; or any lock which
|
||||
* can be taken from interrupt context because rcu_boost()->rt_mutex_lock()
|
||||
* does not disable irqs while taking ->wait_lock.
|
||||
* any lock that is ever acquired while holding them.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* That said, RCU readers are never priority boosted unless they were
|
||||
* preempted. Therefore, one way to avoid deadlock is to make sure
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue