sgi-xp: eliminate '>>>' in comments

Comments in /drivers/misc/sgi-xp has been using '>>>' as a means to draw
attention to something that needs to be done or considered.  To avoid
colliding with git rejects, '>>>' will now be replaced by '!!!' to
indicate something to do, and by '???' to indicate something to be
considered.

Signed-off-by: Dean Nelson <dcn@sgi.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Dean Nelson 2008-07-29 22:34:14 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent 8e85c23ef0
commit ea57f80c8c
9 changed files with 43 additions and 44 deletions

View File

@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
#include <asm/sn/arch.h>
#endif
/* >>> Add this #define to some linux header file some day. */
/* ??? Add this #define to some linux header file some day? */
#define BYTES_PER_WORD sizeof(void *)
#ifdef USE_DBUG_ON
@ -65,18 +65,13 @@
* other partition that is currently up. Over these channels, kernel-level
* `users' can communicate with their counterparts on the other partitions.
*
>>> The following described limitation of a max of eight channels possible
>>> pertains only to ia64-sn2. THIS ISN'T TRUE SINCE I'M PLANNING TO JUST
>>> TIE INTO THE EXISTING MECHANISM ONCE THE CHANNEL MESSAGES ARE RECEIVED.
>>> THE 128-BYTE CACHELINE PERFORMANCE ISSUE IS TIED TO IA64-SN2.
*
* If the need for additional channels arises, one can simply increase
* XPC_MAX_NCHANNELS accordingly. If the day should come where that number
* exceeds the absolute MAXIMUM number of channels possible (eight), then one
* will need to make changes to the XPC code to accommodate for this.
*
* The absolute maximum number of channels possible is currently limited to
* eight for performance reasons. The internal cross partition structures
* The absolute maximum number of channels possible is limited to eight for
* performance reasons on sn2 hardware. The internal cross partition structures
* require sixteen bytes per channel, and eight allows all of this
* interface-shared info to fit in one 128-byte cacheline.
*/

View File

@ -87,11 +87,11 @@ xp_remote_memcpy_sn2(void *vdst, const void *psrc, size_t len)
{
bte_result_t ret;
u64 pdst = ia64_tpa(vdst);
/* >>> What are the rules governing the src and dst addresses passed in?
* >>> Currently we're assuming that dst is a virtual address and src
* >>> is a physical address, is this appropriate? Can we allow them to
* >>> be whatever and we make the change here without damaging the
* >>> addresses?
/* ??? What are the rules governing the src and dst addresses passed in?
* ??? Currently we're assuming that dst is a virtual address and src
* ??? is a physical address, is this appropriate? Can we allow them to
* ??? be whatever and we make the change here without damaging the
* ??? addresses?
*/
/*

View File

@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
static enum xp_retval
xp_remote_memcpy_uv(void *vdst, const void *psrc, size_t len)
{
/* >>> this function needs fleshing out */
/* !!! this function needs fleshing out */
return xpUnsupported;
}

View File

@ -276,9 +276,12 @@ struct xpc_notify {
* There is an array of these structures for each remote partition. It is
* allocated at the time a partition becomes active. The array contains one
* of these structures for each potential channel connection to that partition.
*/
/*
* The following is sn2 only.
*
>>> sn2 only!!!
* Each of these structures manages two message queues (circular buffers).
* Each channel structure manages two message queues (circular buffers).
* They are allocated at the time a channel connection is made. One of
* these message queues (local_msgqueue) holds the locally created messages
* that are destined for the remote partition. The other of these message
@ -345,6 +348,7 @@ struct xpc_notify {
* new messages, by the clearing of the message flags of the acknowledged
* messages.
*/
struct xpc_channel_sn2 {
/* various flavors of local and remote Get/Put values */
@ -359,7 +363,7 @@ struct xpc_channel_sn2 {
};
struct xpc_channel_uv {
/* >>> code is coming */
/* !!! code is coming */
};
struct xpc_channel {
@ -500,7 +504,7 @@ xpc_any_msg_chctl_flags_set(union xpc_channel_ctl_flags *chctl)
}
/*
* Manages channels on a partition basis. There is one of these structures
* Manage channels on a partition basis. There is one of these structures
* for each partition (a partition will never utilize the structure that
* represents itself).
*/
@ -535,7 +539,7 @@ struct xpc_partition_sn2 {
};
struct xpc_partition_uv {
/* >>> code is coming */
/* !!! code is coming */
};
struct xpc_partition {

View File

@ -129,7 +129,7 @@ xpc_process_disconnect(struct xpc_channel *ch, unsigned long *irq_flags)
/* wake those waiting for notify completion */
if (atomic_read(&ch->n_to_notify) > 0) {
/* >>> we do callout while holding ch->lock */
/* we do callout while holding ch->lock, callout can't block */
xpc_notify_senders_of_disconnect(ch);
}

View File

@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ xpc_get_rsvd_page_pa(int nasid)
if (status != SALRET_MORE_PASSES)
break;
/* >>> L1_CACHE_ALIGN() is only a sn2-bte_copy requirement */
/* !!! L1_CACHE_ALIGN() is only a sn2-bte_copy requirement */
if (L1_CACHE_ALIGN(len) > buf_len) {
kfree(buf_base);
buf_len = L1_CACHE_ALIGN(len);

View File

@ -75,7 +75,7 @@ xpc_allow_IPI_ops_sn2(void)
int node;
int nasid;
/* >>> The following should get moved into SAL. */
/* !!! The following should get moved into SAL. */
if (is_shub2()) {
xpc_sh2_IPI_access0_sn2 =
(u64)HUB_L((u64 *)LOCAL_MMR_ADDR(SH2_IPI_ACCESS0));
@ -118,7 +118,7 @@ xpc_disallow_IPI_ops_sn2(void)
int node;
int nasid;
/* >>> The following should get moved into SAL. */
/* !!! The following should get moved into SAL. */
if (is_shub2()) {
for_each_online_node(node) {
nasid = cnodeid_to_nasid(node);
@ -1360,7 +1360,7 @@ xpc_teardown_infrastructure_sn2(struct xpc_partition *part)
* dst must be a cacheline aligned virtual address on this partition.
* cnt must be cacheline sized
*/
/* >>> Replace this function by call to xp_remote_memcpy() or bte_copy()? */
/* ??? Replace this function by call to xp_remote_memcpy() or bte_copy()? */
static enum xp_retval
xpc_pull_remote_cachelines_sn2(struct xpc_partition *part, void *dst,
const void *src, size_t cnt)
@ -2242,7 +2242,7 @@ xpc_send_msg_sn2(struct xpc_channel *ch, u32 flags, void *payload,
notify->key = key;
notify->type = notify_type;
/* >>> is a mb() needed here? */
/* ??? Is a mb() needed here? */
if (ch->flags & XPC_C_DISCONNECTING) {
/*

View File

@ -15,8 +15,8 @@
#include <linux/kernel.h>
/* >>> #include <gru/grukservices.h> */
/* >>> uv_gpa() is defined in <gru/grukservices.h> */
/* !!! #include <gru/grukservices.h> */
/* !!! uv_gpa() is defined in <gru/grukservices.h> */
#define uv_gpa(_a) ((unsigned long)_a)
#include "xpc.h"
@ -29,16 +29,16 @@ static void
xpc_send_local_activate_IRQ_uv(struct xpc_partition *part)
{
/*
* >>> make our side think that the remote parition sent an activate
* >>> message our way. Also do what the activate IRQ handler would
* >>> do had one really been sent.
* !!! Make our side think that the remote parition sent an activate
* !!! message our way. Also do what the activate IRQ handler would
* !!! do had one really been sent.
*/
}
static enum xp_retval
xpc_rsvd_page_init_uv(struct xpc_rsvd_page *rp)
{
/* >>> need to have established xpc_activate_mq earlier */
/* !!! need to have established xpc_activate_mq earlier */
rp->sn.activate_mq_gpa = uv_gpa(xpc_activate_mq);
return xpSuccess;
}
@ -46,7 +46,7 @@ xpc_rsvd_page_init_uv(struct xpc_rsvd_page *rp)
static void
xpc_increment_heartbeat_uv(void)
{
/* >>> send heartbeat msg to xpc_heartbeating_to_mask partids */
/* !!! send heartbeat msg to xpc_heartbeating_to_mask partids */
}
static void
@ -59,7 +59,7 @@ xpc_heartbeat_init_uv(void)
static void
xpc_heartbeat_exit_uv(void)
{
/* >>> send heartbeat_offline msg to xpc_heartbeating_to_mask partids */
/* !!! send heartbeat_offline msg to xpc_heartbeating_to_mask partids */
}
static void
@ -70,9 +70,9 @@ xpc_request_partition_activation_uv(struct xpc_rsvd_page *remote_rp,
struct xpc_partition *part = &xpc_partitions[partid];
/*
* >>> setup part structure with the bits of info we can glean from the rp
* >>> part->remote_rp_pa = remote_rp_pa;
* >>> part->sn.uv.activate_mq_gpa = remote_rp->sn.activate_mq_gpa;
* !!! Setup part structure with the bits of info we can glean from the rp:
* !!! part->remote_rp_pa = remote_rp_pa;
* !!! part->sn.uv.activate_mq_gpa = remote_rp->sn.activate_mq_gpa;
*/
xpc_send_local_activate_IRQ_uv(part);
@ -91,7 +91,7 @@ xpc_request_partition_reactivation_uv(struct xpc_partition *part)
static enum xp_retval
xpc_setup_infrastructure_uv(struct xpc_partition *part)
{
/* >>> this function needs fleshing out */
/* !!! this function needs fleshing out */
return xpUnsupported;
}
@ -102,28 +102,28 @@ xpc_setup_infrastructure_uv(struct xpc_partition *part)
static void
xpc_teardown_infrastructure_uv(struct xpc_partition *part)
{
/* >>> this function needs fleshing out */
/* !!! this function needs fleshing out */
return;
}
static enum xp_retval
xpc_make_first_contact_uv(struct xpc_partition *part)
{
/* >>> this function needs fleshing out */
/* !!! this function needs fleshing out */
return xpUnsupported;
}
static u64
xpc_get_chctl_all_flags_uv(struct xpc_partition *part)
{
/* >>> this function needs fleshing out */
/* !!! this function needs fleshing out */
return 0UL;
}
static struct xpc_msg *
xpc_get_deliverable_msg_uv(struct xpc_channel *ch)
{
/* >>> this function needs fleshing out */
/* !!! this function needs fleshing out */
return NULL;
}

View File

@ -229,9 +229,9 @@ xpnet_receive(short partid, int channel, struct xpnet_message *msg)
if (ret != xpSuccess) {
/*
* >>> Need better way of cleaning skb. Currently skb
* >>> appears in_use and we can't just call
* >>> dev_kfree_skb.
* !!! Need better way of cleaning skb. Currently skb
* !!! appears in_use and we can't just call
* !!! dev_kfree_skb.
*/
dev_err(xpnet, "xp_remote_memcpy(0x%p, 0x%p, 0x%hx) "
"returned error=0x%x\n", (void *)