userfaultfd: replace ENOSPC with ESRCH in case mm has gone during copy/zeropage

When the process exit races with outstanding mcopy_atomic, it would be
better to return ESRCH error.  When such race occurs the process and
it's mm are going away and returning "no such process" to the uffd
monitor seems better fit than ENOSPC.

Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/1502111545-32305-1-git-send-email-rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com
Signed-off-by: Mike Rapoport <rppt@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Suggested-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Acked-by: Michal Hocko <mhocko@suse.com>
Cc: Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@redhat.com>
Cc: "Dr. David Alan Gilbert" <dgilbert@redhat.com>
Cc: Pavel Emelyanov <xemul@virtuozzo.com>
Cc: Mike Kravetz <mike.kravetz@oracle.com>
Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@linux-foundation.org>
Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Mike Rapoport 2017-08-10 15:24:32 -07:00 committed by Linus Torvalds
parent f357e345ee
commit e86b298beb
1 changed files with 2 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@ -1600,7 +1600,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_copy(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
uffdio_copy.len);
mmput(ctx->mm);
} else {
return -ENOSPC;
return -ESRCH;
}
if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_copy->copy)))
return -EFAULT;
@ -1647,7 +1647,7 @@ static int userfaultfd_zeropage(struct userfaultfd_ctx *ctx,
uffdio_zeropage.range.len);
mmput(ctx->mm);
} else {
return -ENOSPC;
return -ESRCH;
}
if (unlikely(put_user(ret, &user_uffdio_zeropage->zeropage)))
return -EFAULT;