drm/i915/perf: fix gen7_append_oa_reports comment
If I'm going to complain about a back-to-front convention then the least I can do is not muddle the comment up too. Signed-off-by: Robert Bragg <robert@sixbynine.org> Reviewed-by: Matthew Auld <matthew.auld@intel.com> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/20170511154345.962-2-lionel.g.landwerlin@intel.com Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
2630addf6b
commit
e81b3a555f
|
@ -431,7 +431,7 @@ static int append_oa_sample(struct i915_perf_stream *stream,
|
|||
* userspace.
|
||||
*
|
||||
* Note: reports are consumed from the head, and appended to the
|
||||
* tail, so the head chases the tail?... If you think that's mad
|
||||
* tail, so the tail chases the head?... If you think that's mad
|
||||
* and back-to-front you're not alone, but this follows the
|
||||
* Gen PRM naming convention.
|
||||
*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue