ASoC: Sort specialised mixers and muxes together

The more flexible value muxes and named mixers don't need to be sorted
differently from a power management point of view, they are different
only in terms of the control interface and not in terms of seqencing
behaviour.

Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@opensource.wolfsonmicro.com>
This commit is contained in:
Mark Brown 2009-06-07 13:08:45 +01:00
parent b22ead2a51
commit e3d4dabd2d
1 changed files with 17 additions and 17 deletions

View File

@ -57,15 +57,15 @@ static int dapm_up_seq[] = {
[snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 2,
[snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 3,
[snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 4,
[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 5,
[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 6,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 7,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 8,
[snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 9,
[snd_soc_dapm_adc] = 10,
[snd_soc_dapm_hp] = 11,
[snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 12,
[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 13,
[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 4,
[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 5,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 6,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 6,
[snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 7,
[snd_soc_dapm_adc] = 8,
[snd_soc_dapm_hp] = 9,
[snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 10,
[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 11,
};
static int dapm_down_seq[] = {
@ -75,14 +75,14 @@ static int dapm_down_seq[] = {
[snd_soc_dapm_spk] = 3,
[snd_soc_dapm_pga] = 4,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer_named_ctl] = 5,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 6,
[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 7,
[snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 8,
[snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 9,
[snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 10,
[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 11,
[snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 12,
[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 13,
[snd_soc_dapm_mixer] = 5,
[snd_soc_dapm_dac] = 6,
[snd_soc_dapm_mic] = 7,
[snd_soc_dapm_micbias] = 8,
[snd_soc_dapm_mux] = 9,
[snd_soc_dapm_value_mux] = 9,
[snd_soc_dapm_supply] = 10,
[snd_soc_dapm_post] = 11,
};
static void pop_wait(u32 pop_time)