libata-sff: Fix documentation
Code moved to ioread/iowrite but the comment didn't Also note a posting issue Signed-off-by: Alan Cox <alan@redhat.com> Signed-off-by: Jeff Garzik <jeff@garzik.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0e3dbc01d5
commit
e1cc9de836
|
@ -297,7 +297,7 @@ void ata_bmdma_start (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
|
||||||
dmactl = ioread8(ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr + ATA_DMA_CMD);
|
dmactl = ioread8(ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr + ATA_DMA_CMD);
|
||||||
iowrite8(dmactl | ATA_DMA_START, ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr + ATA_DMA_CMD);
|
iowrite8(dmactl | ATA_DMA_START, ap->ioaddr.bmdma_addr + ATA_DMA_CMD);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
/* Strictly, one may wish to issue a readb() here, to
|
/* Strictly, one may wish to issue an ioread8() here, to
|
||||||
* flush the mmio write. However, control also passes
|
* flush the mmio write. However, control also passes
|
||||||
* to the hardware at this point, and it will interrupt
|
* to the hardware at this point, and it will interrupt
|
||||||
* us when we are to resume control. So, in effect,
|
* us when we are to resume control. So, in effect,
|
||||||
|
@ -307,6 +307,9 @@ void ata_bmdma_start (struct ata_queued_cmd *qc)
|
||||||
* is expected, so I think it is best to not add a readb()
|
* is expected, so I think it is best to not add a readb()
|
||||||
* without first all the MMIO ATA cards/mobos.
|
* without first all the MMIO ATA cards/mobos.
|
||||||
* Or maybe I'm just being paranoid.
|
* Or maybe I'm just being paranoid.
|
||||||
|
*
|
||||||
|
* FIXME: The posting of this write means I/O starts are
|
||||||
|
* unneccessarily delayed for MMIO
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue