[PATCH] list_del debug check
A list_del() debugging check. Has been in -mm for years. Dave moved list_del() out-of-line in the debug case, so this is now suitable for mainline. Cc: Dave Jones <davej@codemonkey.org.uk> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
199a9afc3d
commit
df89a86463
|
@ -59,14 +59,17 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_add);
|
|||
*/
|
||||
void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
|
||||
{
|
||||
BUG_ON(entry->prev->next != entry);
|
||||
BUG_ON(entry->next->prev != entry);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(entry->prev->next != entry)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, but was %p\n",
|
||||
entry, entry->prev->next);
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. prev->next should be %p, "
|
||||
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->prev->next);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (unlikely(entry->next->prev != entry)) {
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, but was %p\n",
|
||||
entry, entry->next->prev);
|
||||
printk(KERN_ERR "list_del corruption. next->prev should be %p, "
|
||||
"but was %p\n", entry, entry->next->prev);
|
||||
BUG();
|
||||
}
|
||||
__list_del(entry->prev, entry->next);
|
||||
|
@ -74,4 +77,3 @@ void list_del(struct list_head *entry)
|
|||
entry->prev = LIST_POISON2;
|
||||
}
|
||||
EXPORT_SYMBOL(list_del);
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue