From dedc58e067d8c379a15a8a183c5db318201295bb Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Ian Campbell Date: Wed, 4 May 2016 14:21:53 +0100 Subject: [PATCH] VSOCK: do not disconnect socket when peer has shutdown SEND only The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR. Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have had any adverse effects that I can see. I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact on the vmci transport. Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell Cc: "David S. Miller" Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi Cc: Claudio Imbrenda Cc: Andy King Cc: Dmitry Torokhov Cc: Jorgen Hansen Cc: Adit Ranadive Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org Signed-off-by: David S. Miller --- net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c | 21 +-------------------- 1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 20 deletions(-) diff --git a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c index 3dce53ebea92..b5f1221f48d4 100644 --- a/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c +++ b/net/vmw_vsock/af_vsock.c @@ -1808,27 +1808,8 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len, else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN) err = 0; - if (copied > 0) { - /* We only do these additional bookkeeping/notification steps - * if we actually copied something out of the queue pair - * instead of just peeking ahead. - */ - - if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) { - /* If the other side has shutdown for sending and there - * is nothing more to read, then modify the socket - * state. - */ - if (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) { - if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0) { - sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED; - sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE); - sk->sk_state_change(sk); - } - } - } + if (copied > 0) err = copied; - } out: release_sock(sk);