VSOCK: do not disconnect socket when peer has shutdown SEND only

The peer may be expecting a reply having sent a request and then done a
shutdown(SHUT_WR), so tearing down the whole socket at this point seems
wrong and breaks for me with a client which does a SHUT_WR.

Looking at other socket family's stream_recvmsg callbacks doing a shutdown
here does not seem to be the norm and removing it does not seem to have
had any adverse effects that I can see.

I'm using Stefan's RFC virtio transport patches, I'm unsure of the impact
on the vmci transport.

Signed-off-by: Ian Campbell <ian.campbell@docker.com>
Cc: "David S. Miller" <davem@davemloft.net>
Cc: Stefan Hajnoczi <stefanha@redhat.com>
Cc: Claudio Imbrenda <imbrenda@linux.vnet.ibm.com>
Cc: Andy King <acking@vmware.com>
Cc: Dmitry Torokhov <dtor@vmware.com>
Cc: Jorgen Hansen <jhansen@vmware.com>
Cc: Adit Ranadive <aditr@vmware.com>
Cc: netdev@vger.kernel.org
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Ian Campbell 2016-05-04 14:21:53 +01:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 82d69203df
commit dedc58e067
1 changed files with 1 additions and 20 deletions

View File

@ -1808,27 +1808,8 @@ vsock_stream_recvmsg(struct socket *sock, struct msghdr *msg, size_t len,
else if (sk->sk_shutdown & RCV_SHUTDOWN)
err = 0;
if (copied > 0) {
/* We only do these additional bookkeeping/notification steps
* if we actually copied something out of the queue pair
* instead of just peeking ahead.
*/
if (!(flags & MSG_PEEK)) {
/* If the other side has shutdown for sending and there
* is nothing more to read, then modify the socket
* state.
*/
if (vsk->peer_shutdown & SEND_SHUTDOWN) {
if (vsock_stream_has_data(vsk) <= 0) {
sk->sk_state = SS_UNCONNECTED;
sock_set_flag(sk, SOCK_DONE);
sk->sk_state_change(sk);
}
}
}
if (copied > 0)
err = copied;
}
out:
release_sock(sk);