btrfs: reada: Fix returned errno code
reada is using -1 instead of the -ENOMEM defined macro to specify that a buffer allocation failed. Since the error number is propagated, the caller will get a -EPERM which is the wrong error condition. Also, updating the caller to return the exact value from reada_add_block. Smatch tool warning: reada_add_block() warn: returning -1 instead of -ENOMEM is sloppy Reviewed-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com> Signed-off-by: Luis de Bethencourt <luisbg@osg.samsung.com> Signed-off-by: David Sterba <dsterba@suse.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0b8d8ce029
commit
ddd664f447
|
@ -569,7 +569,7 @@ static int reada_add_block(struct reada_control *rc, u64 logical,
|
|||
rec = kzalloc(sizeof(*rec), GFP_NOFS);
|
||||
if (!rec) {
|
||||
reada_extent_put(root->fs_info, re);
|
||||
return -1;
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
rec->rc = rc;
|
||||
|
@ -918,6 +918,7 @@ struct reada_control *btrfs_reada_add(struct btrfs_root *root,
|
|||
u64 start;
|
||||
u64 generation;
|
||||
int level;
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
struct extent_buffer *node;
|
||||
static struct btrfs_key max_key = {
|
||||
.objectid = (u64)-1,
|
||||
|
@ -943,9 +944,10 @@ struct reada_control *btrfs_reada_add(struct btrfs_root *root,
|
|||
generation = btrfs_header_generation(node);
|
||||
free_extent_buffer(node);
|
||||
|
||||
if (reada_add_block(rc, start, &max_key, level, generation)) {
|
||||
ret = reada_add_block(rc, start, &max_key, level, generation);
|
||||
if (ret) {
|
||||
kfree(rc);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(-ENOMEM);
|
||||
return ERR_PTR(ret);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
reada_start_machine(root->fs_info);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue