GFS2: fix skip unlock condition
The recent commit fb6791d100
included the wrong logic. The lvbptr check was incorrectly
added after the patch was tested.
Signed-off-by: David Teigland <teigland@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Steven Whitehouse <swhiteho@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
949db153b6
commit
d4e0bfec9b
|
@ -281,6 +281,7 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
|
|||
{
|
||||
struct gfs2_sbd *sdp = gl->gl_sbd;
|
||||
struct lm_lockstruct *ls = &sdp->sd_lockstruct;
|
||||
int lvb_needs_unlock = 0;
|
||||
int error;
|
||||
|
||||
if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lkid == 0) {
|
||||
|
@ -294,8 +295,12 @@ static void gdlm_put_lock(struct gfs2_glock *gl)
|
|||
gfs2_update_request_times(gl);
|
||||
|
||||
/* don't want to skip dlm_unlock writing the lvb when lock is ex */
|
||||
|
||||
if (gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state == LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE))
|
||||
lvb_needs_unlock = 1;
|
||||
|
||||
if (test_bit(SDF_SKIP_DLM_UNLOCK, &sdp->sd_flags) &&
|
||||
gl->gl_lksb.sb_lvbptr && (gl->gl_state != LM_ST_EXCLUSIVE)) {
|
||||
!lvb_needs_unlock) {
|
||||
gfs2_glock_free(gl);
|
||||
return;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue