mm: don't rely on flags coincidence
Indeed FOLL_WRITE matches FAULT_FLAG_WRITE, matches GUP_FLAGS_WRITE, and it's tempting to devise a set of Grand Unified Paging flags; but not today. So until then, let's rely upon the compiler to spot the coincidence, "rather than have that subtle dependency and a comment for it" - as you remarked in another context yesterday. Signed-off-by: Hugh Dickins <hugh.dickins@tiscali.co.uk> Acked-by: Wu Fengguang <fengguang.wu@intel.com> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@linux-foundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
788c7df451
commit
d26ed650d9
|
@ -1311,8 +1311,10 @@ int __get_user_pages(struct task_struct *tsk, struct mm_struct *mm,
|
|||
while (!(page = follow_page(vma, start, foll_flags))) {
|
||||
int ret;
|
||||
|
||||
/* FOLL_WRITE matches FAULT_FLAG_WRITE! */
|
||||
ret = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, start, foll_flags & FOLL_WRITE);
|
||||
ret = handle_mm_fault(mm, vma, start,
|
||||
(foll_flags & FOLL_WRITE) ?
|
||||
FAULT_FLAG_WRITE : 0);
|
||||
|
||||
if (ret & VM_FAULT_ERROR) {
|
||||
if (ret & VM_FAULT_OOM)
|
||||
return i ? i : -ENOMEM;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue