[ARM] 3023/1: pxa-regs: Typo in ARM pxa register definitions.
Patch from Paul Schulz The following trivial patch is to fix what looks like a typo in the PXA register definitions. The correction comes directly from the definition in the Intel Documentation. http://www.intel.com/design/pca/applicationsprocessors/manuals/278693.htm Intel(R) PXA 255 Processor - Developers Manual - Jan 2004 - Page 12-33 Neither 'UDCCS_IO_ROF' or 'UDCCS_IO_DME' are currently used elseware in the main code (from grep of tree)... The current definitions have been in the code since at lease 2.4.7. Signed-off-by: Paul Schulz <paul@mawsonlakes.org> Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
bb7e257ef8
commit
d1972efaf2
|
@ -653,7 +653,7 @@
|
|||
|
||||
#define UDCCS_IO_RFS (1 << 0) /* Receive FIFO service */
|
||||
#define UDCCS_IO_RPC (1 << 1) /* Receive packet complete */
|
||||
#define UDCCS_IO_ROF (1 << 3) /* Receive overflow */
|
||||
#define UDCCS_IO_ROF (1 << 2) /* Receive overflow */
|
||||
#define UDCCS_IO_DME (1 << 3) /* DMA enable */
|
||||
#define UDCCS_IO_RNE (1 << 6) /* Receive FIFO not empty */
|
||||
#define UDCCS_IO_RSP (1 << 7) /* Receive short packet */
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue