libceph: check data_len in ->alloc_msg()
Only ->alloc_msg() should check data_len of the incoming message against the preallocated ceph_msg, doing it in the messenger is not right. The contract is that either ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg which will fit all of the portions of the incoming message, or it returns NULL and possibly sets skip, signaling whether NULL is due to an -ENOMEM. ->alloc_msg() should be the only place where we make the skip/no-skip decision. I stumbled upon this while looking at con/osd ref counting. Right now, if we get a non-extent message with a larger data portion than we are prepared for, ->alloc_msg() returns a ceph_msg, and then, when we skip it in the messenger, we don't put the con/osd ref acquired in ceph_con_in_msg_alloc() (which is normally put in process_message()), so this also fixes a memory leak. An existing BUG_ON in ceph_msg_data_cursor_init() ensures we don't corrupt random memory should a buggy ->alloc_msg() return an unfit ceph_msg. While at it, I changed the "unknown tid" dout() to a pr_warn() to make sure all skips are seen and unified format strings. Signed-off-by: Ilya Dryomov <idryomov@gmail.com> Reviewed-by: Alex Elder <elder@linaro.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8b9558aab8
commit
d15f9d694b
|
@ -2337,13 +2337,6 @@ static int read_partial_message(struct ceph_connection *con)
|
|||
return ret;
|
||||
|
||||
BUG_ON(!con->in_msg ^ skip);
|
||||
if (con->in_msg && data_len > con->in_msg->data_length) {
|
||||
pr_warn("%s skipping long message (%u > %zd)\n",
|
||||
__func__, data_len, con->in_msg->data_length);
|
||||
ceph_msg_put(con->in_msg);
|
||||
con->in_msg = NULL;
|
||||
skip = 1;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (skip) {
|
||||
/* skip this message */
|
||||
dout("alloc_msg said skip message\n");
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2817,8 +2817,9 @@ out:
|
|||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* lookup and return message for incoming reply. set up reply message
|
||||
* pages.
|
||||
* Lookup and return message for incoming reply. Don't try to do
|
||||
* anything about a larger than preallocated data portion of the
|
||||
* message at the moment - for now, just skip the message.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con,
|
||||
struct ceph_msg_header *hdr,
|
||||
|
@ -2836,10 +2837,10 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con,
|
|||
mutex_lock(&osdc->request_mutex);
|
||||
req = __lookup_request(osdc, tid);
|
||||
if (!req) {
|
||||
*skip = 1;
|
||||
pr_warn("%s osd%d tid %llu unknown, skipping\n",
|
||||
__func__, osd->o_osd, tid);
|
||||
m = NULL;
|
||||
dout("get_reply unknown tid %llu from osd%d\n", tid,
|
||||
osd->o_osd);
|
||||
*skip = 1;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -2849,10 +2850,9 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con,
|
|||
ceph_msg_revoke_incoming(req->r_reply);
|
||||
|
||||
if (front_len > req->r_reply->front_alloc_len) {
|
||||
pr_warn("get_reply front %d > preallocated %d (%u#%llu)\n",
|
||||
front_len, req->r_reply->front_alloc_len,
|
||||
(unsigned int)con->peer_name.type,
|
||||
le64_to_cpu(con->peer_name.num));
|
||||
pr_warn("%s osd%d tid %llu front %d > preallocated %d\n",
|
||||
__func__, osd->o_osd, req->r_tid, front_len,
|
||||
req->r_reply->front_alloc_len);
|
||||
m = ceph_msg_new(CEPH_MSG_OSD_OPREPLY, front_len, GFP_NOFS,
|
||||
false);
|
||||
if (!m)
|
||||
|
@ -2860,37 +2860,22 @@ static struct ceph_msg *get_reply(struct ceph_connection *con,
|
|||
ceph_msg_put(req->r_reply);
|
||||
req->r_reply = m;
|
||||
}
|
||||
m = ceph_msg_get(req->r_reply);
|
||||
|
||||
if (data_len > 0) {
|
||||
struct ceph_osd_data *osd_data;
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* XXX This is assuming there is only one op containing
|
||||
* XXX page data. Probably OK for reads, but this
|
||||
* XXX ought to be done more generally.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
osd_data = osd_req_op_extent_osd_data(req, 0);
|
||||
if (osd_data->type == CEPH_OSD_DATA_TYPE_PAGES) {
|
||||
if (osd_data->pages &&
|
||||
unlikely(osd_data->length < data_len)) {
|
||||
|
||||
pr_warn("tid %lld reply has %d bytes we had only %llu bytes ready\n",
|
||||
tid, data_len, osd_data->length);
|
||||
*skip = 1;
|
||||
ceph_msg_put(m);
|
||||
m = NULL;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (data_len > req->r_reply->data_length) {
|
||||
pr_warn("%s osd%d tid %llu data %d > preallocated %zu, skipping\n",
|
||||
__func__, osd->o_osd, req->r_tid, data_len,
|
||||
req->r_reply->data_length);
|
||||
m = NULL;
|
||||
*skip = 1;
|
||||
goto out;
|
||||
}
|
||||
*skip = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
m = ceph_msg_get(req->r_reply);
|
||||
dout("get_reply tid %lld %p\n", tid, m);
|
||||
|
||||
out:
|
||||
mutex_unlock(&osdc->request_mutex);
|
||||
return m;
|
||||
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct ceph_msg *alloc_msg(struct ceph_connection *con,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue