perf cs-etm: Add last instruction information in packet
Decoder provides last instruction related information, these information can be used for trace analysis; specifically we can get to know what kind of branch instruction has been executed, mainly the information are contained in three element fields: last_i_type: this is significant type for waypoint calculation, it indicates the last instruction is one of immediate branch instruction, indirect branch instruction, instruction barrier (ISB), or data barrier (DSB/DMB). last_i_subtype: this is used for instruction sub type, it can be branch with link, ARMv8 return instruction, ARMv8 eret instruction (return from exception), or ARMv7 instruction which could imply return (e.g. MOV PC, LR; POP { ,PC}). last_instr_cond: it indicates if the last instruction was conditional. But these three fields are not saved into cs_etm_packet struct, thus cs-etm layer don't know related information and cannot generate sample flags for branch instructions. This patch add corresponding three new fields in cs_etm_packet struct and save related value into the packet structure, it is preparation for supporting sample flags. Signed-off-by: Leo Yan <leo.yan@linaro.org> Reviewed-by: Mathieu Poirier <mathieu.poirier@linaro.org> Cc: Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@linux.intel.com> Cc: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> Cc: Mike Leach <mike.leach@linaro.org> Cc: Namhyung Kim <namhyung@kernel.org> Cc: Robert Walker <robert.walker@arm.com> Cc: Suzuki K Poulouse <suzuki.poulose@arm.com> Cc: coresight ml <coresight@lists.linaro.org> Cc: linux-arm-kernel@lists.infradead.org Link: http://lkml.kernel.org/r/20190129122842.32041-2-leo.yan@linaro.org Signed-off-by: Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@redhat.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
55fa8b8c0a
commit
ca45d843a5
|
@ -290,6 +290,9 @@ static void cs_etm_decoder__clear_buffer(struct cs_etm_decoder *decoder)
|
|||
decoder->packet_buffer[i].instr_count = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[i].last_instr_taken_branch = false;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[i].last_instr_size = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[i].last_instr_type = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[i].last_instr_subtype = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[i].last_instr_cond = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[i].cpu = INT_MIN;
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -323,6 +326,9 @@ cs_etm_decoder__buffer_packet(struct cs_etm_decoder *decoder,
|
|||
decoder->packet_buffer[et].instr_count = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[et].last_instr_taken_branch = false;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[et].last_instr_size = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[et].last_instr_type = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[et].last_instr_subtype = 0;
|
||||
decoder->packet_buffer[et].last_instr_cond = 0;
|
||||
|
||||
if (decoder->packet_count == MAX_BUFFER - 1)
|
||||
return OCSD_RESP_WAIT;
|
||||
|
@ -366,6 +372,9 @@ cs_etm_decoder__buffer_range(struct cs_etm_decoder *decoder,
|
|||
packet->start_addr = elem->st_addr;
|
||||
packet->end_addr = elem->en_addr;
|
||||
packet->instr_count = elem->num_instr_range;
|
||||
packet->last_instr_type = elem->last_i_type;
|
||||
packet->last_instr_subtype = elem->last_i_subtype;
|
||||
packet->last_instr_cond = elem->last_instr_cond;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (elem->last_i_type) {
|
||||
case OCSD_INSTR_BR:
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -43,6 +43,9 @@ struct cs_etm_packet {
|
|||
u64 start_addr;
|
||||
u64 end_addr;
|
||||
u32 instr_count;
|
||||
u32 last_instr_type;
|
||||
u32 last_instr_subtype;
|
||||
u8 last_instr_cond;
|
||||
u8 last_instr_taken_branch;
|
||||
u8 last_instr_size;
|
||||
int cpu;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue