NFS: Remove the buggy lock-if-signalled case from do_setlk()
Both NLM and NFSv4 should be able to clean up adequately in the case where the user interrupts the RPC call... Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <Trond.Myklebust@netapp.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
5f50c0c6d6
commit
c4d7c402b7
|
@ -566,17 +566,9 @@ static int do_setlk(struct file *filp, int cmd, struct file_lock *fl)
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
lock_kernel();
|
lock_kernel();
|
||||||
/* Use local locking if mounted with "-onolock" */
|
/* Use local locking if mounted with "-onolock" */
|
||||||
if (!(NFS_SERVER(inode)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_NONLM)) {
|
if (!(NFS_SERVER(inode)->flags & NFS_MOUNT_NONLM))
|
||||||
status = NFS_PROTO(inode)->lock(filp, cmd, fl);
|
status = NFS_PROTO(inode)->lock(filp, cmd, fl);
|
||||||
/* If we were signalled we still need to ensure that
|
else
|
||||||
* we clean up any state on the server. We therefore
|
|
||||||
* record the lock call as having succeeded in order to
|
|
||||||
* ensure that locks_remove_posix() cleans it out when
|
|
||||||
* the process exits.
|
|
||||||
*/
|
|
||||||
if (status == -EINTR || status == -ERESTARTSYS)
|
|
||||||
do_vfs_lock(filp, fl);
|
|
||||||
} else
|
|
||||||
status = do_vfs_lock(filp, fl);
|
status = do_vfs_lock(filp, fl);
|
||||||
unlock_kernel();
|
unlock_kernel();
|
||||||
if (status < 0)
|
if (status < 0)
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue