[S390] Small barrier() and cpu_relax() cleanup.
cpu_relax() has barrier() semantics hence there is no need to use both of them in conjunction in sclp_sync_wait(). Also change cpu_relax() so it's more obvious that it has barrier semantics. Signed-off-by: Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@de.ibm.com> Signed-off-by: Martin Schwidefsky <schwidefsky@de.ibm.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
1125b4640f
commit
c48e09131b
|
@ -433,7 +433,6 @@ sclp_sync_wait(void)
|
|||
get_clock() > timeout &&
|
||||
del_timer(&sclp_request_timer))
|
||||
sclp_request_timer.function(sclp_request_timer.data);
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
cpu_relax();
|
||||
}
|
||||
local_irq_disable();
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -201,9 +201,8 @@ unsigned long get_wchan(struct task_struct *p);
|
|||
static inline void cpu_relax(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
if (MACHINE_HAS_DIAG44)
|
||||
asm volatile("diag 0,0,68" : : : "memory");
|
||||
else
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
asm volatile("diag 0,0,68");
|
||||
barrier();
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue