[PATCH] i386: avoid redundant preempt_disable in __unlazy_fpu
There are two callers of __unlazy_fpu, unlazy_fpu and __switch_to, and none of them appear to require additional preempt_disable/enable here. Let's open-code save_init_fpu in __unlazy_fpu to save a few ops. Signed-off-by: Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de> Signed-off-by: Andi Kleen <ak@suse.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
02b64dab56
commit
c41bf8fa5e
|
@ -74,11 +74,12 @@ static inline void __save_init_fpu( struct task_struct *tsk )
|
|||
task_thread_info(tsk)->status &= ~TS_USEDFPU;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
|
||||
if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) \
|
||||
save_init_fpu( tsk ); \
|
||||
else \
|
||||
tsk->fpu_counter = 0; \
|
||||
#define __unlazy_fpu( tsk ) do { \
|
||||
if (task_thread_info(tsk)->status & TS_USEDFPU) { \
|
||||
__save_init_fpu(tsk); \
|
||||
stts(); \
|
||||
} else \
|
||||
tsk->fpu_counter = 0; \
|
||||
} while (0)
|
||||
|
||||
#define __clear_fpu( tsk ) \
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue