kunit: subtests should be indented 4 spaces according to TAP

Introduce KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT macro which corresponds to 4-space
indentation and KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT macro which corresponds to
8-space indentation in line with TAP spec (e.g. see "Subtests"
section of https://node-tap.org/tap-protocol/).

Use these macros in place of one or two tabs in strings to clarify
why we are indenting.

Suggested-by: Frank Rowand <frowand.list@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: Alan Maguire <alan.maguire@oracle.com>
Reviewed-by: Frank Rowand <frank.rowand@sony.com>
Signed-off-by: Shuah Khan <skhan@linuxfoundation.org>
This commit is contained in:
Alan Maguire 2020-03-26 14:25:09 +00:00 committed by Shuah Khan
parent eda8e324f7
commit c3bba690a2
4 changed files with 59 additions and 48 deletions

View File

@ -84,6 +84,14 @@ struct kunit;
/* Size of log associated with test. */
#define KUNIT_LOG_SIZE 512
/*
* TAP specifies subtest stream indentation of 4 spaces, 8 spaces for a
* sub-subtest. See the "Subtests" section in
* https://node-tap.org/tap-protocol/
*/
#define KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT " "
#define KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT " "
/**
* struct kunit_case - represents an individual test case.
*
@ -395,7 +403,8 @@ void kunit_log_append(char *log, const char *fmt, ...);
} while (0)
#define kunit_printk(lvl, test, fmt, ...) \
kunit_log(lvl, test, "\t# %s: " fmt, (test)->name, ##__VA_ARGS__)
kunit_log(lvl, test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# %s: " fmt, \
(test)->name, ##__VA_ARGS__)
/**
* kunit_info() - Prints an INFO level message associated with @test.

View File

@ -6,6 +6,7 @@
* Author: Brendan Higgins <brendanhiggins@google.com>
*/
#include <kunit/assert.h>
#include <kunit/test.h>
#include "string-stream.h"
@ -53,11 +54,11 @@ void kunit_unary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream);
if (unary_assert->expected_true)
string_stream_add(stream,
"\tExpected %s to be true, but is false\n",
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s to be true, but is false\n",
unary_assert->condition);
else
string_stream_add(stream,
"\tExpected %s to be false, but is true\n",
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s to be false, but is true\n",
unary_assert->condition);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
}
@ -72,11 +73,11 @@ void kunit_ptr_not_err_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream);
if (!ptr_assert->value) {
string_stream_add(stream,
"\tExpected %s is not null, but is\n",
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s is not null, but is\n",
ptr_assert->text);
} else if (IS_ERR(ptr_assert->value)) {
string_stream_add(stream,
"\tExpected %s is not error, but is: %ld\n",
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s is not error, but is: %ld\n",
ptr_assert->text,
PTR_ERR(ptr_assert->value));
}
@ -92,14 +93,14 @@ void kunit_binary_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream);
string_stream_add(stream,
"\tExpected %s %s %s, but\n",
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n",
binary_assert->left_text,
binary_assert->operation,
binary_assert->right_text);
string_stream_add(stream, "\t\t%s == %lld\n",
string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld\n",
binary_assert->left_text,
binary_assert->left_value);
string_stream_add(stream, "\t\t%s == %lld",
string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %lld",
binary_assert->right_text,
binary_assert->right_value);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
@ -114,14 +115,14 @@ void kunit_binary_ptr_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream);
string_stream_add(stream,
"\tExpected %s %s %s, but\n",
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n",
binary_assert->left_text,
binary_assert->operation,
binary_assert->right_text);
string_stream_add(stream, "\t\t%s == %px\n",
string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %px\n",
binary_assert->left_text,
binary_assert->left_value);
string_stream_add(stream, "\t\t%s == %px",
string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %px",
binary_assert->right_text,
binary_assert->right_value);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);
@ -136,14 +137,14 @@ void kunit_binary_str_assert_format(const struct kunit_assert *assert,
kunit_base_assert_format(assert, stream);
string_stream_add(stream,
"\tExpected %s %s %s, but\n",
KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "Expected %s %s %s, but\n",
binary_assert->left_text,
binary_assert->operation,
binary_assert->right_text);
string_stream_add(stream, "\t\t%s == %s\n",
string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %s\n",
binary_assert->left_text,
binary_assert->left_value);
string_stream_add(stream, "\t\t%s == %s",
string_stream_add(stream, KUNIT_SUBSUBTEST_INDENT "%s == %s",
binary_assert->right_text,
binary_assert->right_value);
kunit_assert_print_msg(assert, stream);

View File

@ -69,8 +69,9 @@ EXPORT_SYMBOL_GPL(kunit_suite_num_test_cases);
static void kunit_print_subtest_start(struct kunit_suite *suite)
{
kunit_print_tap_version();
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, "\t# Subtest: %s", suite->name);
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, "\t1..%zd",
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "# Subtest: %s",
suite->name);
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, suite, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "1..%zd",
kunit_suite_num_test_cases(suite));
}
@ -96,7 +97,7 @@ static void kunit_print_ok_not_ok(void *test_or_suite,
kunit_status_to_string(is_ok),
test_number, description);
else
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, "\t%s %zd - %s",
kunit_log(KERN_INFO, test, KUNIT_SUBTEST_INDENT "%s %zd - %s",
kunit_status_to_string(is_ok),
test_number, description);
}

View File

@ -94,7 +94,7 @@ def print_log(log):
for m in log:
print_with_timestamp(m)
TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|\t?ok|\t?not ok|\t?[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|\t?#).*$')
TAP_ENTRIES = re.compile(r'^(TAP|[\s]*ok|[\s]*not ok|[\s]*[0-9]+\.\.[0-9]+|[\s]*#).*$')
def consume_non_diagnositic(lines: List[str]) -> None:
while lines and not TAP_ENTRIES.match(lines[0]):
@ -107,7 +107,7 @@ def save_non_diagnositic(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> None:
OkNotOkResult = namedtuple('OkNotOkResult', ['is_ok','description', 'text'])
OK_NOT_OK_SUBTEST = re.compile(r'^\t(ok|not ok) [0-9]+ - (.*)$')
OK_NOT_OK_SUBTEST = re.compile(r'^[\s]+(ok|not ok) [0-9]+ - (.*)$')
OK_NOT_OK_MODULE = re.compile(r'^(ok|not ok) [0-9]+ - (.*)$')
@ -134,7 +134,7 @@ def parse_ok_not_ok_test_case(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> bool:
else:
return False
SUBTEST_DIAGNOSTIC = re.compile(r'^\t# .*?: (.*)$')
SUBTEST_DIAGNOSTIC = re.compile(r'^[\s]+# .*?: (.*)$')
DIAGNOSTIC_CRASH_MESSAGE = 'kunit test case crashed!'
def parse_diagnostic(lines: List[str], test_case: TestCase) -> bool:
@ -161,7 +161,7 @@ def parse_test_case(lines: List[str]) -> TestCase:
else:
return None
SUBTEST_HEADER = re.compile(r'^\t# Subtest: (.*)$')
SUBTEST_HEADER = re.compile(r'^[\s]+# Subtest: (.*)$')
def parse_subtest_header(lines: List[str]) -> str:
consume_non_diagnositic(lines)
@ -174,7 +174,7 @@ def parse_subtest_header(lines: List[str]) -> str:
else:
return None
SUBTEST_PLAN = re.compile(r'\t[0-9]+\.\.([0-9]+)')
SUBTEST_PLAN = re.compile(r'[\s]+[0-9]+\.\.([0-9]+)')
def parse_subtest_plan(lines: List[str]) -> int:
consume_non_diagnositic(lines)