lock_parent: don't step on stale ->d_parent of all-but-freed one
Dentry that had been through (or into) __dentry_kill() might be seen by shrink_dentry_list(); that's normal, it'll be taken off the shrink list and freed if __dentry_kill() has already finished. The problem is, its ->d_parent might be pointing to already freed dentry, so lock_parent() needs to be careful. We need to check that dentry hasn't already gone into __dentry_kill() *and* grab rcu_read_lock() before dropping ->d_lock - the latter makes sure that whatever we see in ->d_parent after dropping ->d_lock it won't be freed until we drop rcu_read_lock(). Signed-off-by: Al Viro <viro@zeniv.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9c1d5284c7
commit
c2338f2dc7
|
@ -532,10 +532,12 @@ static inline struct dentry *lock_parent(struct dentry *dentry)
|
|||
struct dentry *parent = dentry->d_parent;
|
||||
if (IS_ROOT(dentry))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
if (unlikely((int)dentry->d_lockref.count < 0))
|
||||
return NULL;
|
||||
if (likely(spin_trylock(&parent->d_lock)))
|
||||
return parent;
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
spin_unlock(&dentry->d_lock);
|
||||
again:
|
||||
parent = ACCESS_ONCE(dentry->d_parent);
|
||||
spin_lock(&parent->d_lock);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue