ARM: fix uaccess_with_memcpy() with SW_DOMAIN_PAN

The uaccess_with_memcpy() code is currently incompatible with the SW
PAN code: it takes locks within the region that we've changed the DACR,
potentially sleeping as a result.  As we do not save and restore the
DACR across co-operative sleep events, can lead to an incorrect DACR
value later in this code path.

Reported-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Tested-by: Peter Rosin <peda@axentia.se>
Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk>
This commit is contained in:
Russell King 2015-12-05 13:42:07 +00:00
parent 77f1b959b0
commit c014953d84
2 changed files with 27 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -510,10 +510,14 @@ __copy_to_user_std(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n);
static inline unsigned long __must_check
__copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
{
#ifndef CONFIG_UACCESS_WITH_MEMCPY
unsigned int __ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
n = arm_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
uaccess_restore(__ua_flags);
return n;
#else
return arm_copy_to_user(to, from, n);
#endif
}
extern unsigned long __must_check

View File

@ -88,6 +88,7 @@ pin_page_for_write(const void __user *_addr, pte_t **ptep, spinlock_t **ptlp)
static unsigned long noinline
__copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
{
unsigned long ua_flags;
int atomic;
if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) {
@ -118,7 +119,9 @@ __copy_to_user_memcpy(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
if (tocopy > n)
tocopy = n;
ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
memcpy((void *)to, from, tocopy);
uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
to += tocopy;
from += tocopy;
n -= tocopy;
@ -145,14 +148,21 @@ arm_copy_to_user(void __user *to, const void *from, unsigned long n)
* With frame pointer disabled, tail call optimization kicks in
* as well making this test almost invisible.
*/
if (n < 64)
return __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n);
return __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n);
if (n < 64) {
unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
n = __copy_to_user_std(to, from, n);
uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
} else {
n = __copy_to_user_memcpy(to, from, n);
}
return n;
}
static unsigned long noinline
__clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
{
unsigned long ua_flags;
if (unlikely(segment_eq(get_fs(), KERNEL_DS))) {
memset((void *)addr, 0, n);
return 0;
@ -175,7 +185,9 @@ __clear_user_memset(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
if (tocopy > n)
tocopy = n;
ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
memset((void *)addr, 0, tocopy);
uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
addr += tocopy;
n -= tocopy;
@ -193,9 +205,14 @@ out:
unsigned long arm_clear_user(void __user *addr, unsigned long n)
{
/* See rational for this in __copy_to_user() above. */
if (n < 64)
return __clear_user_std(addr, n);
return __clear_user_memset(addr, n);
if (n < 64) {
unsigned long ua_flags = uaccess_save_and_enable();
n = __clear_user_std(addr, n);
uaccess_restore(ua_flags);
} else {
n = __clear_user_memset(addr, n);
}
return n;
}
#if 0