dmaengine: sa11x0: Replace zero-length array with flexible-array member
The current codebase makes use of the zero-length array language
extension to the C90 standard, but the preferred mechanism to declare
variable-length types such as these ones is a flexible array member[1][2],
introduced in C99:
struct foo {
int stuff;
struct boo array[];
};
By making use of the mechanism above, we will get a compiler warning
in case the flexible array does not occur last in the structure, which
will help us prevent some kind of undefined behavior bugs from being
inadvertently introduced[3] to the codebase from now on.
Also, notice that, dynamic memory allocations won't be affected by
this change:
"Flexible array members have incomplete type, and so the sizeof operator
may not be applied. As a quirk of the original implementation of
zero-length arrays, sizeof evaluates to zero."[1]
This issue was found with the help of Coccinelle.
[1] https://gcc.gnu.org/onlinedocs/gcc/Zero-Length.html
[2] https://github.com/KSPP/linux/issues/21
[3] commit 7649773293
("cxgb3/l2t: Fix undefined behaviour")
Signed-off-by: Gustavo A. R. Silva <gustavo@embeddedor.com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20200214171435.GA22930@embeddedor
Signed-off-by: Vinod Koul <vkoul@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
8faa77332f
commit
bfb59d4a33
|
@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ struct sa11x0_dma_desc {
|
|||
bool cyclic;
|
||||
|
||||
unsigned sglen;
|
||||
struct sa11x0_dma_sg sg[0];
|
||||
struct sa11x0_dma_sg sg[];
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct sa11x0_dma_phy;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue