[PATCH] sched: likely profiling
This likely profiling is pretty fun. I found a few possible problems in sched.c. This patch may be not measurable, but when I did measure long ago, nooping (un)likely cost a couple of % on scheduler heavy benchmarks, so it all adds up. Tweak some branch hints: - the 2nd 64 bits in the bitmask is likely to be populated, because it contains the first 28 bits (nearly 3/4) of the normal priorities. (ratio of 669669:691 ~= 1000:1). - it isn't unlikely that context switching switches to another process. it might be very rapidly switching to and from the idle process (ratio of 475815:419004 and 471330:423544). Let the branch predictor decide. - preempt_enable seems to be very often called in a nested preempt_disable or with interrupts disabled (ratio of 3567760:87965 ~= 40:1) Signed-off-by: Nick Piggin <npiggin@suse.de> Acked-by: Ingo Molnar <mingo@elte.hu> Cc: Daniel Walker <dwalker@mvista.com> Cc: Hua Zhong <hzhong@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Andrew Morton <akpm@osdl.org> Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds <torvalds@osdl.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
f33d9bd504
commit
beed33a816
|
@ -15,7 +15,7 @@ static inline int sched_find_first_bit(const unsigned long *b)
|
||||||
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
|
#if BITS_PER_LONG == 64
|
||||||
if (unlikely(b[0]))
|
if (unlikely(b[0]))
|
||||||
return __ffs(b[0]);
|
return __ffs(b[0]);
|
||||||
if (unlikely(b[1]))
|
if (likely(b[1]))
|
||||||
return __ffs(b[1]) + 64;
|
return __ffs(b[1]) + 64;
|
||||||
return __ffs(b[2]) + 128;
|
return __ffs(b[2]) + 128;
|
||||||
#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 32
|
#elif BITS_PER_LONG == 32
|
||||||
|
|
|
@ -1822,14 +1822,14 @@ context_switch(struct rq *rq, struct task_struct *prev,
|
||||||
struct mm_struct *mm = next->mm;
|
struct mm_struct *mm = next->mm;
|
||||||
struct mm_struct *oldmm = prev->active_mm;
|
struct mm_struct *oldmm = prev->active_mm;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (unlikely(!mm)) {
|
if (!mm) {
|
||||||
next->active_mm = oldmm;
|
next->active_mm = oldmm;
|
||||||
atomic_inc(&oldmm->mm_count);
|
atomic_inc(&oldmm->mm_count);
|
||||||
enter_lazy_tlb(oldmm, next);
|
enter_lazy_tlb(oldmm, next);
|
||||||
} else
|
} else
|
||||||
switch_mm(oldmm, mm, next);
|
switch_mm(oldmm, mm, next);
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
if (unlikely(!prev->mm)) {
|
if (!prev->mm) {
|
||||||
prev->active_mm = NULL;
|
prev->active_mm = NULL;
|
||||||
WARN_ON(rq->prev_mm);
|
WARN_ON(rq->prev_mm);
|
||||||
rq->prev_mm = oldmm;
|
rq->prev_mm = oldmm;
|
||||||
|
@ -3491,7 +3491,7 @@ asmlinkage void __sched preempt_schedule(void)
|
||||||
* If there is a non-zero preempt_count or interrupts are disabled,
|
* If there is a non-zero preempt_count or interrupts are disabled,
|
||||||
* we do not want to preempt the current task. Just return..
|
* we do not want to preempt the current task. Just return..
|
||||||
*/
|
*/
|
||||||
if (unlikely(ti->preempt_count || irqs_disabled()))
|
if (likely(ti->preempt_count || irqs_disabled()))
|
||||||
return;
|
return;
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
need_resched:
|
need_resched:
|
||||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue