pcmcia: avoid static analysis complaint about use-after-free
Coverity complains about a use after free for 'res1' and 'res2' since we use the value of the pointers in a 'dev_dbg()' after they have been freed. That's not really a problem, but it still seems cleaner to defer freeing until we are completely done with the pointers. Signed-off-by: Jesper Juhl <jj@chaosbits.net> Signed-off-by: Jiri Kosina <jkosina@suse.cz>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4de80273a2
commit
bec0b2ce83
|
@ -369,12 +369,12 @@ static int do_validate_mem(struct pcmcia_socket *s,
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
free_region(res2);
|
||||
free_region(res1);
|
||||
|
||||
dev_dbg(&s->dev, "cs: memory probe 0x%06lx-0x%06lx: %p %p %u %u %u",
|
||||
base, base+size-1, res1, res2, ret, info1, info2);
|
||||
|
||||
free_region(res2);
|
||||
free_region(res1);
|
||||
|
||||
if ((ret) || (info1 != info2) || (info1 == 0))
|
||||
return -EINVAL;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue