NFS: remove l_pid field from nfs_lockowner
this field is not used in any important way and probably should
have been removed by
Commit: 8003d3c4aa
("nfs4: treat lock owners as opaque values")
which removed the pid argument from nfs4_get_lock_state.
Except in unusual and uninteresting cases, two threads with the same
->tgid will have the same ->files pointer, so keeping them both
for comparison brings no benefit.
Acked-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: NeilBrown <neilb@suse.com>
Reviewed-by: Jeff Layton <jlayton@redhat.com>
Signed-off-by: Trond Myklebust <trond.myklebust@primarydata.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
4d3b55d3c7
commit
b184b5c38e
|
@ -703,7 +703,6 @@ static void nfs_init_lock_context(struct nfs_lock_context *l_ctx)
|
|||
{
|
||||
atomic_set(&l_ctx->count, 1);
|
||||
l_ctx->lockowner.l_owner = current->files;
|
||||
l_ctx->lockowner.l_pid = current->tgid;
|
||||
INIT_LIST_HEAD(&l_ctx->list);
|
||||
atomic_set(&l_ctx->io_count, 0);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
@ -716,8 +715,6 @@ static struct nfs_lock_context *__nfs_find_lock_context(struct nfs_open_context
|
|||
do {
|
||||
if (pos->lockowner.l_owner != current->files)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
if (pos->lockowner.l_pid != current->tgid)
|
||||
continue;
|
||||
atomic_inc(&pos->count);
|
||||
return pos;
|
||||
} while ((pos = list_entry(pos->list.next, typeof(*pos), list)) != head);
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -2947,7 +2947,6 @@ static int _nfs4_do_setattr(struct inode *inode,
|
|||
} else if (truncate && state != NULL) {
|
||||
struct nfs_lockowner lockowner = {
|
||||
.l_owner = current->files,
|
||||
.l_pid = current->tgid,
|
||||
};
|
||||
if (!nfs4_valid_open_stateid(state))
|
||||
return -EBADF;
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -867,8 +867,7 @@ static void nfs_pageio_cleanup_mirroring(struct nfs_pageio_descriptor *pgio)
|
|||
static bool nfs_match_lock_context(const struct nfs_lock_context *l1,
|
||||
const struct nfs_lock_context *l2)
|
||||
{
|
||||
return l1->lockowner.l_owner == l2->lockowner.l_owner
|
||||
&& l1->lockowner.l_pid == l2->lockowner.l_pid;
|
||||
return l1->lockowner.l_owner == l2->lockowner.l_owner;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/**
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1151,8 +1151,7 @@ int nfs_flush_incompatible(struct file *file, struct page *page)
|
|||
if (l_ctx && flctx &&
|
||||
!(list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_posix) &&
|
||||
list_empty_careful(&flctx->flc_flock))) {
|
||||
do_flush |= l_ctx->lockowner.l_owner != current->files
|
||||
|| l_ctx->lockowner.l_pid != current->tgid;
|
||||
do_flush |= l_ctx->lockowner.l_owner != current->files;
|
||||
}
|
||||
nfs_release_request(req);
|
||||
if (!do_flush)
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -57,7 +57,6 @@ struct nfs_access_entry {
|
|||
|
||||
struct nfs_lockowner {
|
||||
fl_owner_t l_owner;
|
||||
pid_t l_pid;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
struct nfs_lock_context {
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue