drm/i915: Replace lockless_dereference(bool) with READ_ONCE()
After Joonas complained about using READ_ONCE() on the only use of the variable in the function, where the intent was to simply document that the read was intentionally racy and unlocked, I switched the READ_ONCE() over to lockless_dereference(). However, in linux-next that has a stronger type-check to only allow pointers and is no longer interchangeable with READ_ONCE(), see commit331b6d8c7a
("locking/barriers: Validate lockless_dereference() is used on a pointer type") Reported-by: Stephen Rothwell <sfr@canb.auug.org.au> Fixes:67d97da349
("drm/i915: Only start retire worker when idle") Signed-off-by: Chris Wilson <chris@chris-wilson.co.uk> Link: http://patchwork.freedesktop.org/patch/msgid/1467705276-707-1-git-send-email-chris@chris-wilson.co.uk Reviewed-by: Mika Kuoppala <mika.kuoppala@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
af1346a0f3
commit
b1379d4964
|
@ -3290,7 +3290,7 @@ i915_gem_retire_work_handler(struct work_struct *work)
|
|||
* We do not need to do this test under locking as in the worst-case
|
||||
* we queue the retire worker once too often.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if (lockless_dereference(dev_priv->gt.awake))
|
||||
if (READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gt.awake))
|
||||
queue_delayed_work(dev_priv->wq,
|
||||
&dev_priv->gt.retire_work,
|
||||
round_jiffies_up_relative(HZ));
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -3095,7 +3095,7 @@ static void i915_hangcheck_elapsed(struct work_struct *work)
|
|||
if (!i915.enable_hangcheck)
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
if (!lockless_dereference(dev_priv->gt.awake))
|
||||
if (!READ_ONCE(dev_priv->gt.awake))
|
||||
return;
|
||||
|
||||
/* As enabling the GPU requires fairly extensive mmio access,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue