ipmi: Remove smi_msg from waiting_rcv_msgs list before handle_one_recv_msg()
Commit7ea0ed2b5b
("ipmi: Make the message handler easier to use for SMI interfaces") changed handle_new_recv_msgs() to call handle_one_recv_msg() for a smi_msg while the smi_msg is still connected to waiting_rcv_msgs list. That could lead to following list corruption problems: 1) low-level function treats smi_msg as not connected to list handle_one_recv_msg() could end up calling smi_send(), which assumes the msg is not connected to list. For example, the following sequence could corrupt list by doing list_add_tail() for the entry still connected to other list. handle_new_recv_msgs() msg = list_entry(waiting_rcv_msgs) handle_one_recv_msg(msg) handle_ipmb_get_msg_cmd(msg) smi_send(msg) spin_lock(xmit_msgs_lock) list_add_tail(msg) spin_unlock(xmit_msgs_lock) 2) race between multiple handle_new_recv_msgs() instances handle_new_recv_msgs() once releases waiting_rcv_msgs_lock before calling handle_one_recv_msg() then retakes the lock and list_del() it. If others call handle_new_recv_msgs() during the window shown below list_del() will be done twice for the same smi_msg. handle_new_recv_msgs() spin_lock(waiting_rcv_msgs_lock) msg = list_entry(waiting_rcv_msgs) spin_unlock(waiting_rcv_msgs_lock) | | handle_one_recv_msg(msg) | spin_lock(waiting_rcv_msgs_lock) list_del(msg) spin_unlock(waiting_rcv_msgs_lock) Fixes:7ea0ed2b5b
("ipmi: Make the message handler easier to use for SMI interfaces") Signed-off-by: Jun'ichi Nomura <j-nomura@ce.jp.nec.com> [Added a comment to describe why this works.] Signed-off-by: Corey Minyard <cminyard@mvista.com> Cc: stable@vger.kernel.org # 3.19 Tested-by: Ye Feng <yefeng.yl@alibaba-inc.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
dc03c0f9d1
commit
ae4ea9a246
|
@ -3820,6 +3820,7 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(ipmi_smi_t intf)
|
|||
while (!list_empty(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs)) {
|
||||
smi_msg = list_entry(intf->waiting_rcv_msgs.next,
|
||||
struct ipmi_smi_msg, link);
|
||||
list_del(&smi_msg->link);
|
||||
if (!run_to_completion)
|
||||
spin_unlock_irqrestore(&intf->waiting_rcv_msgs_lock,
|
||||
flags);
|
||||
|
@ -3829,11 +3830,14 @@ static void handle_new_recv_msgs(ipmi_smi_t intf)
|
|||
if (rv > 0) {
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* To preserve message order, quit if we
|
||||
* can't handle a message.
|
||||
* can't handle a message. Add the message
|
||||
* back at the head, this is safe because this
|
||||
* tasklet is the only thing that pulls the
|
||||
* messages.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
list_add(&smi_msg->link, &intf->waiting_rcv_msgs);
|
||||
break;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
list_del(&smi_msg->link);
|
||||
if (rv == 0)
|
||||
/* Message handled */
|
||||
ipmi_free_smi_msg(smi_msg);
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue