bpf: Fix racing between bpf_timer_cancel_and_free and bpf_timer_cancel
[ Upstream commit0281b919e1
] The following race is possible between bpf_timer_cancel_and_free and bpf_timer_cancel. It will lead a UAF on the timer->timer. bpf_timer_cancel(); spin_lock(); t = timer->time; spin_unlock(); bpf_timer_cancel_and_free(); spin_lock(); t = timer->timer; timer->timer = NULL; spin_unlock(); hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer); kfree(t); /* UAF on t */ hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer); In bpf_timer_cancel_and_free, this patch frees the timer->timer after a rcu grace period. This requires a rcu_head addition to the "struct bpf_hrtimer". Another kfree(t) happens in bpf_timer_init, this does not need a kfree_rcu because it is still under the spin_lock and timer->timer has not been visible by others yet. In bpf_timer_cancel, rcu_read_lock() is added because this helper can be used in a non rcu critical section context (e.g. from a sleepable bpf prog). Other timer->timer usages in helpers.c have been audited, bpf_timer_cancel() is the only place where timer->timer is used outside of the spin_lock. Another solution considered is to mark a t->flag in bpf_timer_cancel and clear it after hrtimer_cancel() is done. In bpf_timer_cancel_and_free, it busy waits for the flag to be cleared before kfree(t). This patch goes with a straight forward solution and frees timer->timer after a rcu grace period. Fixes:b00628b1c7
("bpf: Introduce bpf timers.") Suggested-by: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Martin KaFai Lau <martin.lau@kernel.org> Signed-off-by: Daniel Borkmann <daniel@iogearbox.net> Acked-by: Hou Tao <houtao1@huawei.com> Link: https://lore.kernel.org/bpf/20240215211218.990808-1-martin.lau@linux.dev Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@kernel.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
9a581b17b7
commit
addf5e297e
|
@ -1091,6 +1091,7 @@ struct bpf_hrtimer {
|
|||
struct bpf_prog *prog;
|
||||
void __rcu *callback_fn;
|
||||
void *value;
|
||||
struct rcu_head rcu;
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/* the actual struct hidden inside uapi struct bpf_timer */
|
||||
|
@ -1312,6 +1313,7 @@ BPF_CALL_1(bpf_timer_cancel, struct bpf_timer_kern *, timer)
|
|||
|
||||
if (in_nmi())
|
||||
return -EOPNOTSUPP;
|
||||
rcu_read_lock();
|
||||
__bpf_spin_lock_irqsave(&timer->lock);
|
||||
t = timer->timer;
|
||||
if (!t) {
|
||||
|
@ -1333,6 +1335,7 @@ out:
|
|||
* if it was running.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
ret = ret ?: hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer);
|
||||
rcu_read_unlock();
|
||||
return ret;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -1387,7 +1390,7 @@ out:
|
|||
*/
|
||||
if (this_cpu_read(hrtimer_running) != t)
|
||||
hrtimer_cancel(&t->timer);
|
||||
kfree(t);
|
||||
kfree_rcu(t, rcu);
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
BPF_CALL_2(bpf_kptr_xchg, void *, map_value, void *, ptr)
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue