net: dont use __netdev_alloc_skb for bounce buffer
commit a1c7fff7e1
(net: netdev_alloc_skb() use build_skb()) broke b44 on
some 64bit machines.
It appears b44 and b43 use __netdev_alloc_skb() instead of alloc_skb()
for their bounce buffers.
There is no need to add an extra NET_SKB_PAD reservation for bounce
buffers :
- In TX path, NET_SKB_PAD is useless
- In RX path in b44, we force a copy of incoming frames if
GFP_DMA allocations were needed.
Reported-and-bisected-by: Stefan Bader <stefan.bader@canonical.com>
Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <edumazet@google.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
parent
3da947b269
commit
acfa9e94e2
|
@ -656,7 +656,7 @@ static int b44_alloc_rx_skb(struct b44 *bp, int src_idx, u32 dest_idx_unmasked)
|
|||
dma_unmap_single(bp->sdev->dma_dev, mapping,
|
||||
RX_PKT_BUF_SZ, DMA_FROM_DEVICE);
|
||||
dev_kfree_skb_any(skb);
|
||||
skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(bp->dev, RX_PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_ATOMIC|GFP_DMA);
|
||||
skb = alloc_skb(RX_PKT_BUF_SZ, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
|
||||
if (skb == NULL)
|
||||
return -ENOMEM;
|
||||
mapping = dma_map_single(bp->sdev->dma_dev, skb->data,
|
||||
|
@ -967,7 +967,7 @@ static netdev_tx_t b44_start_xmit(struct sk_buff *skb, struct net_device *dev)
|
|||
dma_unmap_single(bp->sdev->dma_dev, mapping, len,
|
||||
DMA_TO_DEVICE);
|
||||
|
||||
bounce_skb = __netdev_alloc_skb(dev, len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
|
||||
bounce_skb = alloc_skb(len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
|
||||
if (!bounce_skb)
|
||||
goto err_out;
|
||||
|
||||
|
|
|
@ -1072,7 +1072,7 @@ static int dma_tx_fragment(struct b43legacy_dmaring *ring,
|
|||
meta->dmaaddr = map_descbuffer(ring, skb->data, skb->len, 1);
|
||||
/* create a bounce buffer in zone_dma on mapping failure. */
|
||||
if (b43legacy_dma_mapping_error(ring, meta->dmaaddr, skb->len, 1)) {
|
||||
bounce_skb = __dev_alloc_skb(skb->len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
|
||||
bounce_skb = alloc_skb(skb->len, GFP_ATOMIC | GFP_DMA);
|
||||
if (!bounce_skb) {
|
||||
ring->current_slot = old_top_slot;
|
||||
ring->used_slots = old_used_slots;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue