drm/amd/powerplay/hwmgr: don't add invalid voltage
if atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk returns non zero (fail) in the expansion of the PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE macro the continue will actually do nothing (The macro uses a do ... while(0) as scope, which eats the continue). Based on the code I don't think this was the intent. Unfortunately fixing this requires rewriting the control flow and removing the macros. v2: added signed of by fixed error message print v3: agd: drop DRM_ERROR Signed-off-by: Moritz Kühner <kuehner.moritz@gmail.com> Signed-off-by: Alex Deucher <alexander.deucher@amd.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
c790f87318
commit
ac0cc35008
|
@ -432,19 +432,20 @@ int tonga_get_evv_voltage(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
|
|||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk
|
||||
(hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDGFX, sclk,
|
||||
virtual_voltage_id, &vddgfx),
|
||||
"Error retrieving EVV voltage value!", continue);
|
||||
if (0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk
|
||||
(hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDGFX, sclk,
|
||||
virtual_voltage_id, &vddgfx)) {
|
||||
/* need to make sure vddgfx is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */
|
||||
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE((vddgfx < 2000 && vddgfx != 0), "Invalid VDDGFX value!", return -1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* need to make sure vddgfx is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */
|
||||
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE((vddgfx < 2000 && vddgfx != 0), "Invalid VDDGFX value!", return -1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */
|
||||
if (vddgfx != 0 && vddgfx != virtual_voltage_id) {
|
||||
data->vddcgfx_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = vddgfx;
|
||||
data->vddcgfx_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id;
|
||||
data->vddcgfx_leakage.count++;
|
||||
/* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */
|
||||
if (vddgfx != 0 && vddgfx != virtual_voltage_id) {
|
||||
data->vddcgfx_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = vddgfx;
|
||||
data->vddcgfx_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddcgfx_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id;
|
||||
data->vddcgfx_leakage.count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
printk("Error retrieving EVV voltage value!\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
|
@ -452,19 +453,20 @@ int tonga_get_evv_voltage(struct pp_hwmgr *hwmgr)
|
|||
if (0 == tonga_get_sclk_for_voltage_evv(hwmgr,
|
||||
pptable_info->vddc_lookup_table,
|
||||
virtual_voltage_id, &sclk)) {
|
||||
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk
|
||||
(hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDC, sclk,
|
||||
virtual_voltage_id, &vddc),
|
||||
"Error retrieving EVV voltage value!", continue);
|
||||
if (0 == atomctrl_get_voltage_evv_on_sclk
|
||||
(hwmgr, VOLTAGE_TYPE_VDDC, sclk,
|
||||
virtual_voltage_id, &vddc)) {
|
||||
/* need to make sure vddc is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */
|
||||
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(vddc < 2000, "Invalid VDDC value!", return -1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* need to make sure vddc is less than 2v or else, it could burn the ASIC. */
|
||||
PP_ASSERT_WITH_CODE(vddc < 2000, "Invalid VDDC value!", return -1);
|
||||
|
||||
/* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */
|
||||
if (vddc != 0 && vddc != virtual_voltage_id) {
|
||||
data->vddc_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddc_leakage.count] = vddc;
|
||||
data->vddc_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddc_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id;
|
||||
data->vddc_leakage.count++;
|
||||
/* the voltage should not be zero nor equal to leakage ID */
|
||||
if (vddc != 0 && vddc != virtual_voltage_id) {
|
||||
data->vddc_leakage.actual_voltage[data->vddc_leakage.count] = vddc;
|
||||
data->vddc_leakage.leakage_id[data->vddc_leakage.count] = virtual_voltage_id;
|
||||
data->vddc_leakage.count++;
|
||||
}
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
printk("Error retrieving EVV voltage value!\n");
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue