mfd: Fix twl6030 lockdep recursion warning on setting wake IRQs
LOCKDEP explicitly sets all irq_desc locks as a single lock-class, causing "possible recursive locking detected" when the TWL RTC driver calls through enable_irq_wake to twl6030_irq_set_wake, which recursively calls irq_set_irq_wake. Although the irq_desc and lock are different, LOCKDEP treats these as equivalent, presumably due to problems that can be incurred when locking more than one irq_desc, so best to avoid this. Suspend/resume actions implemented as PM notifiers to avoid touch the TWL core for this. Signed-off-by: Todd Poynor <toddpoynor@google.com> Acked-by: Santosh Shilimkar <santosh.shilimkar@ti.com> Signed-off-by: Samuel Ortiz <sameo@linux.intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
d3efa4edd5
commit
ab2b9260df
|
@ -37,6 +37,7 @@
|
|||
#include <linux/kthread.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/i2c/twl.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/platform_device.h>
|
||||
#include <linux/suspend.h>
|
||||
|
||||
#include "twl-core.h"
|
||||
|
||||
|
@ -83,8 +84,42 @@ static int twl6030_interrupt_mapping[24] = {
|
|||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||||
|
||||
static unsigned twl6030_irq_base;
|
||||
static int twl_irq;
|
||||
static bool twl_irq_wake_enabled;
|
||||
|
||||
static struct completion irq_event;
|
||||
static atomic_t twl6030_wakeirqs = ATOMIC_INIT(0);
|
||||
|
||||
static int twl6030_irq_pm_notifier(struct notifier_block *notifier,
|
||||
unsigned long pm_event, void *unused)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int chained_wakeups;
|
||||
|
||||
switch (pm_event) {
|
||||
case PM_SUSPEND_PREPARE:
|
||||
chained_wakeups = atomic_read(&twl6030_wakeirqs);
|
||||
|
||||
if (chained_wakeups && !twl_irq_wake_enabled) {
|
||||
if (enable_irq_wake(twl_irq))
|
||||
pr_err("twl6030 IRQ wake enable failed\n");
|
||||
else
|
||||
twl_irq_wake_enabled = true;
|
||||
} else if (!chained_wakeups && twl_irq_wake_enabled) {
|
||||
disable_irq_wake(twl_irq);
|
||||
twl_irq_wake_enabled = false;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
break;
|
||||
default:
|
||||
break;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
return NOTIFY_DONE;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
static struct notifier_block twl6030_irq_pm_notifier_block = {
|
||||
.notifier_call = twl6030_irq_pm_notifier,
|
||||
};
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* This thread processes interrupts reported by the Primary Interrupt Handler.
|
||||
|
@ -189,9 +224,12 @@ static inline void activate_irq(int irq)
|
|||
|
||||
int twl6030_irq_set_wake(struct irq_data *d, unsigned int on)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int twl_irq = (int)irq_get_chip_data(d->irq);
|
||||
if (on)
|
||||
atomic_inc(&twl6030_wakeirqs);
|
||||
else
|
||||
atomic_dec(&twl6030_wakeirqs);
|
||||
|
||||
return irq_set_irq_wake(twl_irq, on);
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
/*----------------------------------------------------------------------*/
|
||||
|
@ -354,6 +392,9 @@ int twl6030_init_irq(int irq_num, unsigned irq_base, unsigned irq_end)
|
|||
status = PTR_ERR(task);
|
||||
goto fail_kthread;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
twl_irq = irq_num;
|
||||
register_pm_notifier(&twl6030_irq_pm_notifier_block);
|
||||
return status;
|
||||
|
||||
fail_kthread:
|
||||
|
@ -367,6 +408,7 @@ fail_irq:
|
|||
|
||||
int twl6030_exit_irq(void)
|
||||
{
|
||||
unregister_pm_notifier(&twl6030_irq_pm_notifier_block);
|
||||
|
||||
if (twl6030_irq_base) {
|
||||
pr_err("twl6030: can't yet clean up IRQs?\n");
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue