ipv6: get rid of ipip6_prl_lock

As noticed by Julia Lawall, ipip6_tunnel_add_prl() incorrectly calls 
kzallloc(..., GFP_KERNEL) while a spinlock is held. She provided
a patch to use GFP_ATOMIC instead.

One possibility would be to convert this spinlock to a mutex, or
preallocate the thing before taking the lock.

After RCU conversion, it appears we dont need this lock, since 
caller already holds RTNL

Signed-off-by: Eric Dumazet <eric.dumazet@gmail.com>
Signed-off-by: David S. Miller <davem@davemloft.net>
This commit is contained in:
Eric Dumazet 2010-06-01 00:26:58 -07:00 committed by David S. Miller
parent 95e3bb7aff
commit aac4dddc35
1 changed files with 2 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@ -249,8 +249,6 @@ failed:
return NULL;
}
static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(ipip6_prl_lock);
#define for_each_prl_rcu(start) \
for (prl = rcu_dereference(start); \
prl; \
@ -340,7 +338,7 @@ ipip6_tunnel_add_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a, int chg)
if (a->addr == htonl(INADDR_ANY))
return -EINVAL;
spin_lock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
ASSERT_RTNL();
for (p = t->prl; p; p = p->next) {
if (p->addr == a->addr) {
@ -370,7 +368,6 @@ ipip6_tunnel_add_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a, int chg)
t->prl_count++;
rcu_assign_pointer(t->prl, p);
out:
spin_unlock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
return err;
}
@ -397,7 +394,7 @@ ipip6_tunnel_del_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a)
struct ip_tunnel_prl_entry *x, **p;
int err = 0;
spin_lock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
ASSERT_RTNL();
if (a && a->addr != htonl(INADDR_ANY)) {
for (p = &t->prl; *p; p = &(*p)->next) {
@ -419,7 +416,6 @@ ipip6_tunnel_del_prl(struct ip_tunnel *t, struct ip_tunnel_prl *a)
}
}
out:
spin_unlock(&ipip6_prl_lock);
return err;
}