I2C: mv64xxx: remove I2C_M_NOSTART code
As this driver does not advertise protocol mangling support (I2C_FUNC_PROTOCOL_MANGLING is not set), having code to act on I2C_M_NOSTART is illogical, and in any case isn't supportable on anything but the first message - which makes no sense. Remove the I2C_M_NOSTART code. Signed-off-by: Russell King <rmk+kernel@arm.linux.org.uk> Acked-by: Mark A. Greer <mgreer@animalcreek.com> Signed-off-by: Wolfram Sang <wsa@the-dreams.de>
This commit is contained in:
parent
0c195afb87
commit
aa6bce5319
|
@ -419,28 +419,12 @@ mv64xxx_i2c_execute_msg(struct mv64xxx_i2c_data *drv_data, struct i2c_msg *msg,
|
|||
spin_lock_irqsave(&drv_data->lock, flags);
|
||||
mv64xxx_i2c_prepare_for_io(drv_data, msg);
|
||||
|
||||
if (unlikely(msg->flags & I2C_M_NOSTART)) { /* Skip start/addr phases */
|
||||
if (drv_data->msg->flags & I2C_M_RD) {
|
||||
/* No action to do, wait for slave to send a byte */
|
||||
drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_CONTINUE;
|
||||
drv_data->state =
|
||||
MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_SLAVE_DATA;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_DATA;
|
||||
drv_data->state =
|
||||
MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_SLAVE_ACK;
|
||||
drv_data->bytes_left--;
|
||||
}
|
||||
if (is_first) {
|
||||
drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
|
||||
drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
if (is_first) {
|
||||
drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_START;
|
||||
drv_data->state =
|
||||
MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_START_COND;
|
||||
} else {
|
||||
drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1;
|
||||
drv_data->state =
|
||||
MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_ADDR_1_ACK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
drv_data->action = MV64XXX_I2C_ACTION_SEND_ADDR_1;
|
||||
drv_data->state = MV64XXX_I2C_STATE_WAITING_FOR_ADDR_1_ACK;
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
drv_data->send_stop = is_last;
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue