tracing: Add proper check for irq_depth routines
The check_irq_entry and check_irq_return could be called from graph event context. In such case there's no graph private data allocated. Adding checks to handle this case. Signed-off-by: Jiri Olsa <jolsa@redhat.com> LKML-Reference: <20100924154102.GB1818@jolsa.brq.redhat.com> [ Fixed some grammar in the comments ] Signed-off-by: Steven Rostedt <rostedt@goodmis.org>
This commit is contained in:
parent
907f278409
commit
a9d61173dc
|
@ -888,12 +888,20 @@ check_irq_entry(struct trace_iterator *iter, u32 flags,
|
|||
unsigned long addr, int depth)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpu = iter->cpu;
|
||||
int *depth_irq;
|
||||
struct fgraph_data *data = iter->private;
|
||||
int *depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are either displaying irqs, or we got called as
|
||||
* a graph event and private data does not exist,
|
||||
* then we bypass the irq check.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS) ||
|
||||
(!data))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are inside the irq code
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
@ -926,12 +934,20 @@ static int
|
|||
check_irq_return(struct trace_iterator *iter, u32 flags, int depth)
|
||||
{
|
||||
int cpu = iter->cpu;
|
||||
int *depth_irq;
|
||||
struct fgraph_data *data = iter->private;
|
||||
int *depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
|
||||
|
||||
if (flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS)
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* If we are either displaying irqs, or we got called as
|
||||
* a graph event and private data does not exist,
|
||||
* then we bypass the irq check.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
if ((flags & TRACE_GRAPH_PRINT_IRQS) ||
|
||||
(!data))
|
||||
return 0;
|
||||
|
||||
depth_irq = &(per_cpu_ptr(data->cpu_data, cpu)->depth_irq);
|
||||
|
||||
/*
|
||||
* We are not inside the irq code.
|
||||
*/
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue