From a93c20f5832221c2bf5f80199c4eaebc0ba28e16 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Linus Torvalds Date: Sun, 23 Apr 2023 09:56:20 -0700 Subject: [PATCH] gcc: disable '-Warray-bounds' for gcc-13 too commit 0da6e5fd6c3726723e275603426e09178940dace upstream. We started disabling '-Warray-bounds' for gcc-12 originally on s390, because it resulted in some warnings that weren't realistically fixable (commit 8b202ee21839: "s390: disable -Warray-bounds"). That s390-specific issue was then found to be less common elsewhere, but generic (see f0be87c42cbd: "gcc-12: disable '-Warray-bounds' universally for now"), and then later expanded the version check was expanded to gcc-11 (5a41237ad1d4: "gcc: disable -Warray-bounds for gcc-11 too"). And it turns out that I was much too optimistic in thinking that it's all going to go away, and here we are with gcc-13 showing all the same issues. So instead of expanding this one version at a time, let's just disable it for gcc-11+, and put an end limit to it only when we actually find a solution. Yes, I'm sure some of this is because the kernel just does odd things (like our "container_of()" use, but also knowingly playing games with things like linker tables and array layouts). And yes, some of the warnings are likely signs of real bugs, but when there are hundreds of false positives, that doesn't really help. Oh well. Signed-off-by: Linus Torvalds Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman --- init/Kconfig | 10 +++------- 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 7 deletions(-) diff --git a/init/Kconfig b/init/Kconfig index 0c214af99085..2028ed4d50f5 100644 --- a/init/Kconfig +++ b/init/Kconfig @@ -892,18 +892,14 @@ config CC_IMPLICIT_FALLTHROUGH default "-Wimplicit-fallthrough=5" if CC_IS_GCC && $(cc-option,-Wimplicit-fallthrough=5) default "-Wimplicit-fallthrough" if CC_IS_CLANG && $(cc-option,-Wunreachable-code-fallthrough) -# Currently, disable gcc-11,12 array-bounds globally. -# We may want to target only particular configurations some day. +# Currently, disable gcc-11+ array-bounds globally. +# It's still broken in gcc-13, so no upper bound yet. config GCC11_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS def_bool y -config GCC12_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS - def_bool y - config CC_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS bool - default y if CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 110000 && GCC_VERSION < 120000 && GCC11_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS - default y if CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 120000 && GCC_VERSION < 130000 && GCC12_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS + default y if CC_IS_GCC && GCC_VERSION >= 110000 && GCC11_NO_ARRAY_BOUNDS # # For architectures that know their GCC __int128 support is sound