hollalinux
/
linux-sg2042
mirror of https://github.com/sophgo/linux-riscv.git
1
0
Fork 0
Code Issues Packages Projects Releases Wiki Activity

ACPI: WMI: Clean up handling of spec violating data blocks 

Acer violate the ACPI-WMI spec by declaring some of their data blocks as
expensive, but with no corresponding WCxx method. There is already some
workaround code in to handle the initial WCxx call (we just ignore a
failure here); but we need to properly check if the second, "clean up",
WCxx call is actually needed or not, rather than fail simply because it
isn't there.

Signed-off-by: Carlos Corbacho <carlos@strangeworlds.co.uk>
Signed-off-by: Len Brown <len.brown@intel.com>
This commit is contained in:
Carlos Corbacho 2008-02-24 13:34:34 +00:00 committed by Len Brown
parent 9b963c4030
commit a527f2d7fe
1 changed files with 6 additions and 4 deletions
Show Stats Download Patch File Download Diff File Expand all files Collapse all files

6
drivers/acpi/wmi.c
View File

@ -293,7 +293,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
{
struct guid_block *block = NULL;
struct wmi_block *wblock = NULL;
acpi_handle handle;
acpi_handle handle, wc_handle;
acpi_status status, wc_status = AE_ERROR;
struct acpi_object_list input, wc_input;
union acpi_object wc_params[1], wq_params[1];
@ -338,6 +338,8 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
* expensive, but have no corresponding WCxx method. So we
* should not fail if this happens.
*/
wc_status = acpi_get_handle(handle, wc_method, &wc_handle);
if (ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status))
wc_status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle, wc_method,
&wc_input, NULL);
}
@ -351,7 +353,7 @@ struct acpi_buffer *out)
* If ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE, call the relevant WCxx method, even if
* the WQxx method failed - we should disable collection anyway.
*/
if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && wc_status) {
if ((block->flags & ACPI_WMI_EXPENSIVE) && ACPI_SUCCESS(wc_status)) {
wc_params[0].integer.value = 0;
status = acpi_evaluate_object(handle,
wc_method, &wc_input, NULL);