Btrfs: get better concurrency for snapshot-aware defrag work
Using spinning case instead of blocking will result in better concurrency overall. Signed-off-by: Liu Bo <bo.li.liu@oracle.com> Signed-off-by: Josef Bacik <jbacik@fusionio.com> Signed-off-by: Chris Mason <chris.mason@fusionio.com>
This commit is contained in:
parent
de3cb945db
commit
a09a0a705d
|
@ -2312,6 +2312,7 @@ again:
|
|||
key.type = BTRFS_EXTENT_DATA_KEY;
|
||||
key.offset = start;
|
||||
|
||||
path->leave_spinning = 1;
|
||||
if (merge) {
|
||||
struct btrfs_file_extent_item *fi;
|
||||
u64 extent_len;
|
||||
|
@ -2368,6 +2369,7 @@ again:
|
|||
|
||||
btrfs_mark_buffer_dirty(leaf);
|
||||
inode_add_bytes(inode, len);
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
|
||||
ret = btrfs_inc_extent_ref(trans, root, new->bytenr,
|
||||
new->disk_len, 0,
|
||||
|
@ -2381,6 +2383,7 @@ again:
|
|||
ret = 1;
|
||||
out_free_path:
|
||||
btrfs_release_path(path);
|
||||
path->leave_spinning = 0;
|
||||
btrfs_end_transaction(trans, root);
|
||||
out_unlock:
|
||||
unlock_extent_cached(&BTRFS_I(inode)->io_tree, lock_start, lock_end,
|
||||
|
|
Loading…
Reference in New Issue